From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25818C433DB for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D620123381 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389062AbhATN1u (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:27:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36802 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731056AbhATNOg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:14:36 -0500 Received: from canardo.mork.no (canardo.mork.no [IPv6:2001:4641::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 984D2C061575 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 05:13:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from miraculix.mork.no (fwa136.mork.no [192.168.9.136]) (authenticated bits=0) by canardo.mork.no (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 10KDDk88028336 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:13:46 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mork.no; s=b; t=1611148426; bh=f7usLHEwtXaZEMJIInzm30T0cQiBe6Bp+4SEsYKM+08=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:Message-ID:From; b=UWrkBRtK3z+f5jmNTdWURJ3KHP6LD9UByRrcYjVD2QlNRYfTbVtkmgkJWXp1VmuPx 9Ot3ZbZG5xeHMi5j1Or8BoxB3pI88pFwwJuMU90Q0AlOjta5Y3C08TfaWdPawdXFc+ OGfFBNsSRDLIMgdjAkAdcN8LPTKaCAo6AzJ20Q1A= Received: from bjorn by miraculix.mork.no with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l2DIv-002lDQ-SK; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:13:45 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= To: Giacinto Cifelli Cc: Reinhard Speyerer , netdev@vger.kernel.org, rspmn@arcor.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: qmi_wwan: added support for Thales Cinterion PLSx3 modem family Organization: m References: <20210118054611.15439-1-gciofono@gmail.com> <20210118115250.GA1428@t-online.de> <87a6t6j6vn.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:13:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Giacinto Cifelli's message of "Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:36:01 +0100") Message-ID: <87mtx3agza.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at canardo X-Virus-Status: Clean Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Giacinto Cifelli writes: > Hi Bj=C3=B8rn, > I have fixed and resent, but from your comment I might not have > selected the right line from maintaner.pl? > what I have is this: > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --file drivers/net/usb/qmi_wwan.c > "Bj=C3=B8rn Mork" (maintainer:USB QMI WWAN NETWORK DRIVER) > "David S. Miller" (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS) > Jakub Kicinski (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS) > netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:USB QMI WWAN NETWORK DRIVER) > <<<< this seems the right one > linux-usb@vger.kernel.org (open list:USB NETWORKING DRIVERS) > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) > > I have at the same time sent a patch for another enumeration of the > same product, for cdc_ether. In that case, I have picked the > following line, which also looked the best fit: > linux-usb@vger.kernel.org (open list:USB CDC ETHERNET DRIVER) > > Did I misinterpret the results of the script? Yes, but I'll be the first to admit that it isn't easy.=20=20 netdev is definitely correct, and the most important one. But in theory you are supposed to use all the listed addresses. Except that I don't think you need to CC David (and Jakub?) since they probably read everything in netdev anyway. And I believe many (most?) people leave out the linux-kernel catch-all, since it doesn't provide any extra coverage for networking. At least I do. Then there's the two remaining addresses. The linux-usb list is traditionally CCed on patches touching USB drivers, since the USB experts are there and not necessarily in netdev. And I'd like a copy because that's the only way I'll be able to catch these patches. I don't read any of the lists regularily. This is my interpretation only. I am sure there are other opinions. But as usual, you cannot do anything wrong. The worst that can ever happen is that you have to resend a patch or miss my review of it ;-) Bj=C3=B8rn