From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBF7C433E0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF1E20656 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ObiszCEs"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="C1soCkNq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726412AbgHJUfh (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:35:37 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:53338 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726396AbgHJUfg (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:35:36 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1597091735; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yNzwJsZq0mgDyRAhYCynTgpgOJY9cZb7szfD0lOx3Qw=; b=ObiszCEsfhVCEK6T/Y8aKJELf8CV03FEs8wcx22E/gGETJ4zWqkaVfwUERABbgNh8F0Y1N 2hZvUG4gCSS4w0lrR2KEQ6++Hns+wjv6PszrgcmEkfNqA7K65fcEFyfw3ZYcKao4HcoQ3J 0RAaxRvhOBRwyg01q9mPk7f9tKLyHU0nWyvVmxSLhHtS2ofWAgQApzvqyD9GX2MCwe4e6A iQuqyY1NsoGBdnE8PsqUiVk0592dp+TNAIIbZnbW9K+52C5LPRHguqtQhUNwvtjb/DTBBE 0aVfPEfrZQ0dPvZTsQJmtBOrStWw2RWKkVXhWuiyZYrjtgHnLnwSzBYFUpQaFQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1597091735; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yNzwJsZq0mgDyRAhYCynTgpgOJY9cZb7szfD0lOx3Qw=; b=C1soCkNqNhkB7Udr3QsyMNtcaTgWv3XX4g6C5XQy+u0XGDLWVHkmI2N+1zvGjeBcOZ+vZh /0dheUx6y2S+KSCQ== To: Frank van der Linden , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4] genirq/affinity: Make affinity setting if activated opt-in In-Reply-To: <20200810202740.GA22367@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-c1893d73.us-west-2.amazon.com> References: <20200810202503.22317-1-fllinden@amazon.com> <20200810202740.GA22367@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-c1893d73.us-west-2.amazon.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:33:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87mu32xmux.fsf@nanos> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Frank van der Linden writes: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:25:03PM +0000, Frank van der Linden wrote: >> Implement the necessary core logic and make the two irqchip implementations >> for which this is required opt-in. In hindsight this would have been the >> right thing to do, but ... > > I backported this one since it had a minor conflict, so while the main > one was Cc-ed to stable@, it didn't get picked up. > > Ran it through all our regression tests and the reproducer case, and it's > fine. LGTM