All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Lidong Chen <lidong.chen@oracle.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, darren.kenny@oracle.com, f4bug@amsat.org,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Andrzej Zaborowski <balrogg@gmail.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>,
	Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@wavecomp.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sd: Fix out-of-bounds assertions
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 07:51:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mukziv48.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554750276-19230-1-git-send-email-lidong.chen@oracle.com> (Lidong Chen's message of "Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:04:36 -0400")

Lidong Chen <lidong.chen@oracle.com> writes:

> Due to an off-by-one error, the assert statements allow an
> out-of-bounds array access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <lidong.chen@oracle.com>
> ---
>  hw/sd/sd.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index aaab15f..818f86c 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static const char *sd_state_name(enum SDCardStates state)
>      if (state == sd_inactive_state) {
>          return "inactive";
>      }
> -    assert(state <= ARRAY_SIZE(state_name));
> +    assert(state < ARRAY_SIZE(state_name));
>      return state_name[state];
>  }
>  
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static const char *sd_response_name(sd_rsp_type_t rsp)
>      if (rsp == sd_r1b) {
>          rsp = sd_r1;
>      }
> -    assert(rsp <= ARRAY_SIZE(response_name));
> +    assert(rsp < ARRAY_SIZE(response_name));
>      return response_name[rsp];
>  }

This is the second fix for this bug pattern in a fortnight.  Where's
one, there are more:

$ git-grep '<= ARRAY_SIZE'
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c:    assert(aprmax <= ARRAY_SIZE(cs->ich_apr[0]));
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c:    assert(aprmax <= ARRAY_SIZE(cs->ich_apr[0]));
hw/net/stellaris_enet.c:        if (s->tx_fifo_len + 4 <= ARRAY_SIZE(s->tx_fifo)) {
hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c:        && s->tx_len <= ARRAY_SIZE(s->tx_fifo)
hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c:        && s->rx_len <= ARRAY_SIZE(s->rx_fifo)
hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c:        && s->resp_len <= ARRAY_SIZE(s->resp_fifo);
hw/sd/sd.c:    assert(state <= ARRAY_SIZE(state_name));
hw/sd/sd.c:    assert(rsp <= ARRAY_SIZE(response_name));
hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c:    assert(n <= ARRAY_SIZE(tmp));
target/mips/op_helper.c:    if (base_reglist > 0 && base_reglist <= ARRAY_SIZE (multiple_regs)) {
target/mips/op_helper.c:    if (base_reglist > 0 && base_reglist <= ARRAY_SIZE (multiple_regs)) {
target/mips/op_helper.c:    if (base_reglist > 0 && base_reglist <= ARRAY_SIZE (multiple_regs)) {
target/mips/op_helper.c:    if (base_reglist > 0 && base_reglist <= ARRAY_SIZE (multiple_regs)) {
target/ppc/kvm.c:           <= ARRAY_SIZE(hw_debug_points));
target/ppc/kvm.c:           <= ARRAY_SIZE(hw_debug_points));
target/ppc/kvm.c:    assert((nb_hw_breakpoint + nb_hw_watchpoint) <= ARRAY_SIZE(dbg->arch.bp));
tcg/tcg.c:    tcg_debug_assert(pi <= ARRAY_SIZE(op->args));
util/main-loop.c:    g_assert(n_poll_fds <= ARRAY_SIZE(poll_fds));
util/module.c:    assert(n_dirs <= ARRAY_SIZE(dirs));

Lidong Chen, would you like to have a look at these?

Cc'ing maintainers to help with further investigation.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Lidong Chen <lidong.chen@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@wavecomp.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, f4bug@amsat.org, darren.kenny@oracle.com,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sd: Fix out-of-bounds assertions
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 07:51:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mukziv48.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190409055151.7m-VLjcfR-sisIDae2O00bDs_GuvZQRbKtcgLUsiCnQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554750276-19230-1-git-send-email-lidong.chen@oracle.com> (Lidong Chen's message of "Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:04:36 -0400")

Lidong Chen <lidong.chen@oracle.com> writes:

> Due to an off-by-one error, the assert statements allow an
> out-of-bounds array access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <lidong.chen@oracle.com>
> ---
>  hw/sd/sd.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index aaab15f..818f86c 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static const char *sd_state_name(enum SDCardStates state)
>      if (state == sd_inactive_state) {
>          return "inactive";
>      }
> -    assert(state <= ARRAY_SIZE(state_name));
> +    assert(state < ARRAY_SIZE(state_name));
>      return state_name[state];
>  }
>  
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static const char *sd_response_name(sd_rsp_type_t rsp)
>      if (rsp == sd_r1b) {
>          rsp = sd_r1;
>      }
> -    assert(rsp <= ARRAY_SIZE(response_name));
> +    assert(rsp < ARRAY_SIZE(response_name));
>      return response_name[rsp];
>  }

This is the second fix for this bug pattern in a fortnight.  Where's
one, there are more:

$ git-grep '<= ARRAY_SIZE'
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c:    assert(aprmax <= ARRAY_SIZE(cs->ich_apr[0]));
hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c:    assert(aprmax <= ARRAY_SIZE(cs->ich_apr[0]));
hw/net/stellaris_enet.c:        if (s->tx_fifo_len + 4 <= ARRAY_SIZE(s->tx_fifo)) {
hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c:        && s->tx_len <= ARRAY_SIZE(s->tx_fifo)
hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c:        && s->rx_len <= ARRAY_SIZE(s->rx_fifo)
hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c:        && s->resp_len <= ARRAY_SIZE(s->resp_fifo);
hw/sd/sd.c:    assert(state <= ARRAY_SIZE(state_name));
hw/sd/sd.c:    assert(rsp <= ARRAY_SIZE(response_name));
hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c:    assert(n <= ARRAY_SIZE(tmp));
target/mips/op_helper.c:    if (base_reglist > 0 && base_reglist <= ARRAY_SIZE (multiple_regs)) {
target/mips/op_helper.c:    if (base_reglist > 0 && base_reglist <= ARRAY_SIZE (multiple_regs)) {
target/mips/op_helper.c:    if (base_reglist > 0 && base_reglist <= ARRAY_SIZE (multiple_regs)) {
target/mips/op_helper.c:    if (base_reglist > 0 && base_reglist <= ARRAY_SIZE (multiple_regs)) {
target/ppc/kvm.c:           <= ARRAY_SIZE(hw_debug_points));
target/ppc/kvm.c:           <= ARRAY_SIZE(hw_debug_points));
target/ppc/kvm.c:    assert((nb_hw_breakpoint + nb_hw_watchpoint) <= ARRAY_SIZE(dbg->arch.bp));
tcg/tcg.c:    tcg_debug_assert(pi <= ARRAY_SIZE(op->args));
util/main-loop.c:    g_assert(n_poll_fds <= ARRAY_SIZE(poll_fds));
util/module.c:    assert(n_dirs <= ARRAY_SIZE(dirs));

Lidong Chen, would you like to have a look at these?

Cc'ing maintainers to help with further investigation.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-09  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-08 19:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sd: Fix out-of-bounds assertions Lidong Chen
2019-04-08 19:04 ` Lidong Chen
2019-04-08 19:53 ` Marc-André Lureau
2019-04-08 19:53   ` Marc-André Lureau
2019-04-08 21:27 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-08 21:57   ` Lidong Chen
2019-04-09  0:18 ` Li Qiang
2019-04-09  0:18   ` Li Qiang
2019-04-09  5:51 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-04-09  5:51   ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-09  8:59   ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-04-09  8:59     ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-04-09  9:37     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-09  9:37       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-11 11:52       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-11 11:52         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-11 12:20         ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-11 12:20           ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-11 12:45           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-11 12:45             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-11 13:25             ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-11 13:25               ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-09  9:40   ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-04-09  9:40     ` Aleksandar Markovic
2019-04-09  9:48   ` Peter Maydell
2019-04-09  9:48     ` Peter Maydell
2019-04-09 10:39   ` Liam Merwick
2019-04-09 10:39     ` Liam Merwick
2019-04-10 21:49     ` Lidong Chen
2019-04-10 21:49       ` Lidong Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mukziv48.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=amarkovic@wavecomp.com \
    --cc=arikalo@wavecomp.com \
    --cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=balrogg@gmail.com \
    --cc=darren.kenny@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=lidong.chen@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.