diff for duplicates of <87mutue4y8.fsf@toke.dk>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index dab90fa..964ea9d 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -2,22 +2,24 @@ Wen Gong <wgong@qti.qualcomm.com> writes:
 
 >> -----Original Message-----
 >> From: ath10k <ath10k-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On Behalf Of Toke
->> Høiland-Jørgensen
+>> H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen
 >> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 6:44 PM
 >> To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>; ath10k@lists.infradead.org;
 >> johannes@sipsolutions.net
 >> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
->> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi
+>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC Wi=
+Fi
 >> chips
->> 
+>>=20
 >> Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:
->> 
+>>=20
 >> > Upstream kernel has an interface to help adjust sk_pacing_shift to
 >> > help improve TCP UL throughput.
 >> > The sk_pacing_shift is 8 in mac80211, this is based on test with 11N
 >> > WiFi chips with ath9k. For QCA6174/QCA9377 PCI 11AC chips, the 11AC
 >> > VHT80 TCP UL throughput testing result shows 6 is the optimal.
->> > Overwrite the sk_pacing_shift to 6 in ath10k driver for QCA6174/9377 PCI.
+>> > Overwrite the sk_pacing_shift to 6 in ath10k driver for QCA6174/9377 P=
+CI.
 >> >
 >> > Tested with QCA6174 PCI with firmware
 >> > WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00109-QCARMSWPZ-1, but this will also affect QCA9377
@@ -46,25 +48,30 @@ Wen Gong <wgong@qti.qualcomm.com> writes:
 >> >  default(262144)+5 Streams                598
 >> >  changed(2621440)+1 Stream                598
 >> >  changed(2621440)+2 Streams               601
->> 
->> You still haven't provided any latency numbers for these tests, which makes
->> it impossible to verify that setting sk_pacing_shift to 6 is the right tradeoff.
->> 
->> As I said before, from your numbers I suspect the right setting is actually 7,
+>>=20
+>> You still haven't provided any latency numbers for these tests, which ma=
+kes
+>> it impossible to verify that setting sk_pacing_shift to 6 is the right t=
+radeoff.
+>>=20
+>> As I said before, from your numbers I suspect the right setting is actua=
+lly 7,
 >> which would be 10-20ms less latency under load; way more important than
 >> ~50 Mbps...
->> 
+>>=20
 > Hi Toke,
 > Could you give the command line for the latency test?
 > https://flent.org/intro.html#quick-start
 > I used the command but test failed:
-> flent tcp_download -p 1 -l 60 -H 192.168.1.5 -t text-to-be-included-in-plot -o file1.png
+> flent tcp_download -p 1 -l 60 -H 192.168.1.5 -t text-to-be-included-in-pl=
+ot -o file1.png
 > error loading plotter: unable to find plot configuration "1"
 
 Try something like:
 
 
-flent -H 192.168.1.5 -t "sk_pacing_shift 7" tcp_nup --test-parameter upload_streams=1
+flent -H 192.168.1.5 -t "sk_pacing_shift 7" tcp_nup --test-parameter upload=
+_streams=3D1
 
 
 This will note the value of sk_pacing_shift you are testing in the data
@@ -85,8 +92,3 @@ are also very welcome to send me the .flent.gz data files and I'll take
 a look to make sure everything looks reasonable :)
 
 -Toke
-
-_______________________________________________
-ath10k mailing list
-ath10k@lists.infradead.org
-http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index ac2c3c0..9dc5986 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -7,31 +7,33 @@
  "Date\0Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:17:35 +0200\0"
  "To\0Wen Gong <wgong@qti.qualcomm.com>"
   Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
-  ath10k@lists.infradead.org <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
- " johannes@sipsolutions.net <johannes@sipsolutions.net>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>\0"
+ " ath10k\\@lists.infradead.org <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>"
+ " johannes\\@sipsolutions.net <johannes@sipsolutions.net>\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-wireless\\@vger.kernel.org <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Wen Gong <wgong@qti.qualcomm.com> writes:\n"
  "\n"
  ">> -----Original Message-----\n"
  ">> From: ath10k <ath10k-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On Behalf Of Toke\n"
- ">> H\303\270iland-J\303\270rgensen\n"
+ ">> H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen\n"
  ">> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 6:44 PM\n"
  ">> To: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>; ath10k@lists.infradead.org;\n"
  ">> johannes@sipsolutions.net\n"
  ">> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org\n"
- ">> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC WiFi\n"
+ ">> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: Set sk_pacing_shift to 6 for 11AC Wi=\n"
+ "Fi\n"
  ">> chips\n"
- ">> \n"
+ ">>=20\n"
  ">> Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> writes:\n"
- ">> \n"
+ ">>=20\n"
  ">> > Upstream kernel has an interface to help adjust sk_pacing_shift to\n"
  ">> > help improve TCP UL throughput.\n"
  ">> > The sk_pacing_shift is 8 in mac80211, this is based on test with 11N\n"
  ">> > WiFi chips with ath9k. For QCA6174/QCA9377 PCI 11AC chips, the 11AC\n"
  ">> > VHT80 TCP UL throughput testing result shows 6 is the optimal.\n"
- ">> > Overwrite the sk_pacing_shift to 6 in ath10k driver for QCA6174/9377 PCI.\n"
+ ">> > Overwrite the sk_pacing_shift to 6 in ath10k driver for QCA6174/9377 P=\n"
+ "CI.\n"
  ">> >\n"
  ">> > Tested with QCA6174 PCI with firmware\n"
  ">> > WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00109-QCARMSWPZ-1, but this will also affect QCA9377\n"
@@ -60,25 +62,30 @@
  ">> >  default(262144)+5 Streams                598\n"
  ">> >  changed(2621440)+1 Stream                598\n"
  ">> >  changed(2621440)+2 Streams               601\n"
- ">> \n"
- ">> You still haven't provided any latency numbers for these tests, which makes\n"
- ">> it impossible to verify that setting sk_pacing_shift to 6 is the right tradeoff.\n"
- ">> \n"
- ">> As I said before, from your numbers I suspect the right setting is actually 7,\n"
+ ">>=20\n"
+ ">> You still haven't provided any latency numbers for these tests, which ma=\n"
+ "kes\n"
+ ">> it impossible to verify that setting sk_pacing_shift to 6 is the right t=\n"
+ "radeoff.\n"
+ ">>=20\n"
+ ">> As I said before, from your numbers I suspect the right setting is actua=\n"
+ "lly 7,\n"
  ">> which would be 10-20ms less latency under load; way more important than\n"
  ">> ~50 Mbps...\n"
- ">> \n"
+ ">>=20\n"
  "> Hi Toke,\n"
  "> Could you give the command line for the latency test?\n"
  "> https://flent.org/intro.html#quick-start\n"
  "> I used the command but test failed:\n"
- "> flent tcp_download -p 1 -l 60 -H 192.168.1.5 -t text-to-be-included-in-plot -o file1.png\n"
+ "> flent tcp_download -p 1 -l 60 -H 192.168.1.5 -t text-to-be-included-in-pl=\n"
+ "ot -o file1.png\n"
  "> error loading plotter: unable to find plot configuration \"1\"\n"
  "\n"
  "Try something like:\n"
  "\n"
  "\n"
- "flent -H 192.168.1.5 -t \"sk_pacing_shift 7\" tcp_nup --test-parameter upload_streams=1\n"
+ "flent -H 192.168.1.5 -t \"sk_pacing_shift 7\" tcp_nup --test-parameter upload=\n"
+ "_streams=3D1\n"
  "\n"
  "\n"
  "This will note the value of sk_pacing_shift you are testing in the data\n"
@@ -98,11 +105,6 @@
  "are also very welcome to send me the .flent.gz data files and I'll take\n"
  "a look to make sure everything looks reasonable :)\n"
  "\n"
- "-Toke\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "ath10k mailing list\n"
- "ath10k@lists.infradead.org\n"
- http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
+ -Toke
 
-3217a7b7c7ccc6291feddcf801f40fbc50ba23d24ed13404978536d5f1f65e26
+73ec2850439c7585d0476629cfd4611b74f9c9319380ec693367d7b67cb7b83c
