From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1dmIDT-0007IT-VT for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:28:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmIDO-0007FM-Pv for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:28:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmIDN-0005I6-TM for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:28:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmIDJ-0005Fi-FB; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:28:17 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EAA7C04B927; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:28:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4EAA7C04B927 Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-116-75.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.75]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E77860605; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8AAB81138662; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:28:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20170728053610.15770-1-f4bug@amsat.org> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:28:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170728053610.15770-1-f4bug@amsat.org> ("Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Fri, 28 Jul 2017 02:35:23 -0300") Message-ID: <87mv6k2apd.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:28:16 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/47] add missing entries in MAINTAINERS X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:28:26 -0000 Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 writes: > Hi, > > I first prepared this series thinking about 2.10 but then realized if som= eone > is calling ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl he better is using an updated git > clone :) > > Distribs do provide docs/ files in /usr/share/doc/qemu* but not the > MAINTAINERS file so no hurry for this series. > > I provided the script I used in the last patch, I plan to improve it so > patchew/travis can start to use it: if a new file is added to the reposit= ory > without being covered in MAINTAINERS the script remember the submitter ab= out > it and eventually he'll resend his patch, I think this is a good practice= and > help the next contributors (anyway this is a valuable experience to look = at a > file history to see who has been hacking around when there is no MAINTAIN= ERS > entry). > > I don't want to overburden current maintainers, so the last patches add > Orphans entries but I tried to select relevant commiters and include them= in > each patch. > > The criteria I used is "If I change this file, who should I notify? Who w= ould > be interested?" Where do we stand with this series? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmIDM-0007Ex-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:28:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dmIDJ-0005Ft-LW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:28:20 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <20170728053610.15770-1-f4bug@amsat.org> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:28:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170728053610.15770-1-f4bug@amsat.org> ("Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Fri, 28 Jul 2017 02:35:23 -0300") Message-ID: <87mv6k2apd.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/47] add missing entries in MAINTAINERS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 writes: > Hi, > > I first prepared this series thinking about 2.10 but then realized if som= eone > is calling ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl he better is using an updated git > clone :) > > Distribs do provide docs/ files in /usr/share/doc/qemu* but not the > MAINTAINERS file so no hurry for this series. > > I provided the script I used in the last patch, I plan to improve it so > patchew/travis can start to use it: if a new file is added to the reposit= ory > without being covered in MAINTAINERS the script remember the submitter ab= out > it and eventually he'll resend his patch, I think this is a good practice= and > help the next contributors (anyway this is a valuable experience to look = at a > file history to see who has been hacking around when there is no MAINTAIN= ERS > entry). > > I don't want to overburden current maintainers, so the last patches add > Orphans entries but I tried to select relevant commiters and include them= in > each patch. > > The criteria I used is "If I change this file, who should I notify? Who w= ould > be interested?" Where do we stand with this series?