From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F282095B for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751314AbdCWH4J (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 03:56:09 -0400 Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com ([217.69.77.222]:43087 "EHLO kerckhoffs.g10code.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751123AbdCWH4J (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 03:56:09 -0400 Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1cqwhF-0003NP-Es for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:58:09 +0100 Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1cqwbd-0006tg-Uv; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:21 +0100 From: Werner Koch To: Peter Lebbing Cc: "Bernhard E. Reiter" , Michael J Gruber , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Git Mailing List , gnupg-devel@gnupg.org, Lukas Puehringer , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Stable GnuPG interface, git should use GPGME References: <201703101100.15214.bernhard.reiter@intevation.de> <201703131350.00139.bernhard.reiter@intevation.de> <13c66211-9671-5bd3-f3eb-96ffd5c39975@drmicha.warpmail.net> <201703171056.10468.bernhard.reiter@intevation.de> <87poh9p70n.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> Organisation: The GnuPG Project X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text. OpenPGP: url=https://k.gnupg.net/80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367 Mail-Followup-To: Peter Lebbing , "Bernhard E. Reiter" , Michael J Gruber , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Git Mailing List , gnupg-devel@gnupg.org, Lukas Puehringer , Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:52:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Peter Lebbing's message of "Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:46:28 +0100") Message-ID: <87mvcco57j.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=constitution_Steve_Case_MP5K-SD_22nd_SAS_Centro_colonel_TWA_Adriatic"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --=constitution_Steve_Case_MP5K-SD_22nd_SAS_Centro_colonel_TWA_Adriatic Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:46, peter@digitalbrains.com said: > under the impression you are actually answering the question "can GPGME > be used in the same way regardless of the GnuPG version" instead? Right. > 3) is because GnuPG 1.4 cannot update a secret key at all. Adding a new > subkey fails with: Indeed, I was not anymore aware of this limitation in versions < 2.1. There are even more conflicts when PGP-2 keys (to me the only valid reason to use gpg1 along with gpg2) or ECC keys need to be considered. Shalom-Salam, Werner =2D-=20 Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. --=constitution_Steve_Case_MP5K-SD_22nd_SAS_Centro_colonel_TWA_Adriatic Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQTX/8BjtAoilLlm20f/gK6dHew1jQUCWNNwoAAKCRD/gK6dHew1 jXjBAP9IIj5ehfghdo/nhnCROVUnBmkQeubDVcKZN90zexGR8gEAxKAwJMWv02Eo 1/fi0SgFTPIH6xjfRuH3VxHmPT6oLQ0= =WKZn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=constitution_Steve_Case_MP5K-SD_22nd_SAS_Centro_colonel_TWA_Adriatic--