From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abhishek L Subject: Re: Are we ready for jewel 10.2.6? Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:45:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87mve5vrsj.fsf@suse.com> References: <63289246-25fb-c96f-b844-dba82d7293c5@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:47763 "EHLO smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750985AbdBAPpT (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:45:19 -0500 In-reply-to: <63289246-25fb-c96f-b844-dba82d7293c5@suse.cz> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nathan Cutler Cc: Abhishek Lekshmanan , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Nathan Cutler writes: > Hi Abhishek: > > The stable releases and backports team has been working to prepare the > Jewel 10.2.6 release and so far we have merged a large number of > bugfixes and even some features that were judged to be worth backporting. > > I don't have a full list, yet, because I'm still merging RGW backports > and there a few more miscellaneous backports still in the queue. The > integration tests are looking better and better, and I expect these will > be merged within the next week or two. > > Do you think it's time to publish a 10.2.6 point release? Yes, lets start getting the leads approval and handover to QE -- Abhishek Lekshmanan SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)