From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avhWy-0001BK-Vc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:42:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avhWy-0005wB-3K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:42:40 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1461750767-23273-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1461750767-23273-7-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <5720E01A.1010909@redhat.com> <20160428082122.GA4474@noname.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:42:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160428082122.GA4474@noname.redhat.com> (Kevin Wolf's message of "Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:21:22 +0200") Message-ID: <87mvoeruo6.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/17] bochs: Implement .bdrv_co_preadv() interface List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Eric Blake , famz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, sw@weilnetz.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com Kevin Wolf writes: > Am 27.04.2016 um 17:51 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: >> On 04/27/2016 03:52 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf >> > --- >> > block/bochs.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> > >> >> > static void bochs_close(BlockDriverState *bs) >> > @@ -267,7 +279,7 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_bochs = { >> > .instance_size = sizeof(BDRVBochsState), >> > .bdrv_probe = bochs_probe, >> > .bdrv_open = bochs_open, >> > - .bdrv_read = bochs_co_read, >> > + .bdrv_co_preadv = bochs_co_preadv, >> > .bdrv_close = bochs_close, >> > }; >> >> Alignment is funky here. I'd rather just get rid of all the extra >> spaces, if that's easier than having half but not all of the = aligned. > > Alignment is funky by definition when there are tabs involved and new > code follows the coding style and uses spaces instead. With a tab stop > of 4, this is aligned correctly. Four? It comes out correctly with tab-width 8 for me. You can have any tab stops you want as long as it's multiples of eight. > The other option would be to just convert the whole struct to spaces, > but that's not really related to this patch and I think we're avoiding > pure style cleanup patches to keep things like 'git blame' useful. We normally untabify the lines we touch anyway, and leave the rest alone.