From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UouRU-0003S6-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:51:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UouRR-0004CI-Kf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:51:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UouRR-0004CE-Cp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:51:17 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1371515385-32203-7-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> ("Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber=22's?= message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:29:45 +0200") References: <1371515385-32203-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1371515385-32203-7-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:51:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87mwqnprgs.fsf@elfo.elfo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v3 6/6] cpu: Guard cpu_{save, load}() definitions Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > A few targets already managed to implement cpu_save() and cpu_load() > without defining CPU_SAVE_VERSION that causes them to be registered. > > Guard the prototypes with CPU_SAVE_VERSION to avoid this happening again > until all targets are converted to VMState (or QIDL). > > Signed-off-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela