From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [RFC 00/24] OMAP serial driver flow control fixes, and preparation for DMA engine conversion Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:29:03 -0700 Message-ID: <87mwzuxjtc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <20121006123803.GD15246@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <507427DA.6020409@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <507427DA.6020409@ti.com> (Sourav's message of "Tue, 9 Oct 2012 19:04:18 +0530") Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sourav Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Tony Lindgren , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alan Cox List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi Sourav, Sourav writes: [...] > Boot Tested this patch series against v3.6 tag(applied cleanly) on > panda board and > PM tested(hitting off in Idle and suspend) on omap3630 based beagle board. > > Note, I also tested the patches against the current master but only > after rebasing, since the current master includes serial patches from > Felipe Balbi[1]. > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/24/139 > > Tested-by: Sourav Poddar Did you test flow control after off-mode transitons? Russell indicated that the context save/restore is not saving important bits related to HW flow control, so I suspect some more testing, specifically of flow control after off-mode is needed. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:29:03 -0700 Subject: [RFC 00/24] OMAP serial driver flow control fixes, and preparation for DMA engine conversion In-Reply-To: <507427DA.6020409@ti.com> (Sourav's message of "Tue, 9 Oct 2012 19:04:18 +0530") References: <20121006123803.GD15246@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <507427DA.6020409@ti.com> Message-ID: <87mwzuxjtc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Sourav, Sourav writes: [...] > Boot Tested this patch series against v3.6 tag(applied cleanly) on > panda board and > PM tested(hitting off in Idle and suspend) on omap3630 based beagle board. > > Note, I also tested the patches against the current master but only > after rebasing, since the current master includes serial patches from > Felipe Balbi[1]. > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/24/139 > > Tested-by: Sourav Poddar Did you test flow control after off-mode transitons? Russell indicated that the context save/restore is not saving important bits related to HW flow control, so I suspect some more testing, specifically of flow control after off-mode is needed. Kevin