From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: PM: Summary of changes for v3.6 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:11:17 -0700 Message-ID: <87mx2zcq62.fsf@ti.com> References: <201207162246.03660.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.209]:36624 "EHLO na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752941Ab2GPWKx (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:10:53 -0400 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so11017724pbb.20 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:10:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201207162246.03660.rjw@sisk.pl> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:46:03 +0200") Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano Cc: LKML , Linux PM list , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Mailing List , Alan Stern Rafael, Daniel, "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > Hi all, > > All of the changes I'd like to include into the first PM pull request during > the v3.6 merge window, except maybe for one or two patches I know are in the > works, is on the 'linux-next' branch of the linux-pm.git tree now. The summary > of those changes is appended. If anyone finds any of them objectionable, > please let me know ASAP. Also please let me know if you have any power > management patches you'd like me to take for v3.6. > Could someone please clarify the status of the coupled CPUidle series? There's a version of these in Daniels cpuidle-next branch and there's a version of these in Len's next branch (included in linux-next), but I'm still not entirely sure which branch is going upstream and which branch has the latest version (but I think Daniel's is the latest) Thanks for clarifying, Kevin