From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mmc: block: replace __blk_end_request() with blk_end_request() Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:30:30 -0400 Message-ID: <87mx4g4lft.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <1334082412-2821-1-git-send-email-subhashj@codeaurora.org> <87pqbfv3e1.fsf@laptop.org> <000201cd174a$f3019b80$d904d280$@codeaurora.org> <000301cd1d22$57444d40$05cce7c0$@codeaurora.org> <000001cd35af$2eae5ba0$8c0b12e0$@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:53616 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752410Ab2FFNaf (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:30:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <000001cd35af$2eae5ba0$8c0b12e0$@codeaurora.org> (Subhash Jadavani's message of "Sat, 19 May 2012 16:34:19 +0530") Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Subhash Jadavani Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, 'Namjae Jeon' Hi, On Sat, May 19 2012, Subhash Jadavani wrote: > Do you see any issues with this patch? No, no issues -- please could I ask you to refresh it against 3.5-rc1 (it no longer applies) and add your performance numbers to the commit message? I'll push it to mmc-next and probably merge for 3.6, so that we have a full round of linux-next for anyone to notice problems. Thanks! - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child