All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <87mx4p5niq.fsf@ti.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index a35b021..e70a94f 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 >>>>>>
 >>> [...]
 >>>>>> - Rather than hooking into omap4_enter_lowpower(), should use
->>>>>>  the cluster PM enter/exit notifier chain.
+>>>>>> ?the cluster PM enter/exit notifier chain.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>> This is again specific to device OFF only and not related to CPU
 >>>>> cluster state as such. So I don't think notifiers should be used here.
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 >>>
 >>> Like the overall idea, but one minor dumb concern might be sequencing
 >>> of notifiers
->>>  - OFF entry and restore needs things to be executed in a specific sequence.
+>>> ?- OFF entry and restore needs things to be executed in a specific sequence.
 >>> How do we plan to ensure the sequence is maintained in a notifier call
 >>> chain? one
 >>> possible option might be a "priority" based scheme?
@@ -63,12 +63,3 @@ needs to be well described in the changlog.
 Thanks,
 
 Kevin
-
-
-
-
-
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
-the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 89c0323..09fcd39 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,18 +6,10 @@
  "ref\0CAOMWX4ctJcfGNxXK4hT+QH-m7zUfP1N3H56oVDVzPFmhVTFOMw@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "ref\087wr3t8s81.fsf@ti.com\0"
  "ref\0CAOMWX4ewVauzYW9pJq07=moLcgkBLyvx68o7T8975cGvshfK3Q@mail.gmail.com\0"
- "From\0Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCHv2 04/19] ARM: OMAP4: PM: save/restore all DPLL settings in OFF mode\0"
+ "From\0khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCHv2 04/19] ARM: OMAP4: PM: save/restore all DPLL settings in OFF mode\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 30 May 2012 15:09:49 -0700\0"
- "To\0Menon"
- " Nishanth <nm@ti.com>\0"
- "Cc\0Shilimkar"
-  Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
-  paul@pwsan.com
-  Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
-  Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
-  linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
- " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "\"Menon, Nishanth\" <nm@ti.com> writes:\n"
@@ -34,7 +26,7 @@
  ">>>>>>\n"
  ">>> [...]\n"
  ">>>>>> - Rather than hooking into omap4_enter_lowpower(), should use\n"
- ">>>>>> \302\240the cluster PM enter/exit notifier chain.\n"
+ ">>>>>> ?the cluster PM enter/exit notifier chain.\n"
  ">>>>>>\n"
  ">>>>> This is again specific to device OFF only and not related to CPU\n"
  ">>>>> cluster state as such. So I don't think notifiers should be used here.\n"
@@ -48,7 +40,7 @@
  ">>>\n"
  ">>> Like the overall idea, but one minor dumb concern might be sequencing\n"
  ">>> of notifiers\n"
- ">>> \302\240- OFF entry and restore needs things to be executed in a specific sequence.\n"
+ ">>> ?- OFF entry and restore needs things to be executed in a specific sequence.\n"
  ">>> How do we plan to ensure the sequence is maintained in a notifier call\n"
  ">>> chain? one\n"
  ">>> possible option might be a \"priority\" based scheme?\n"
@@ -84,15 +76,6 @@
  "\n"
  "Thanks,\n"
  "\n"
- "Kevin\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-omap\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ Kevin
 
-807c570ba240e627971cf6361564e381c34b477c16a33dadb81bf5d4a3692181
+f7f6b26812974684aa57e61b31d6a1790c4a7a0322810d55b71d11bea466bea4

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.