All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Maxime Petazzoni <mpetazzoni@mvista.com>
Cc: "Premi, Sanjeev" <premi@ti.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VDD1 voltage after resume from idle
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:29:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87my2h3v9t.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091120162933.GC2354@mvista.com> (Maxime Petazzoni's message of "Fri\, 20 Nov 2009 17\:29\:33 +0100")

Maxime Petazzoni <mpetazzoni@mvista.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> * Premi, Sanjeev <premi@ti.com> [2009-11-20 21:17:04]:
>
>> I am facing a strange problem on OMAP3EVM after resuming from idle.
>> When using OPP5, the VDD1 voltage ramps to 1.35V.
>>  
>> However, when i go thru the idle/wakeup cycle, the voltage never
>> ramps back to 1.35V but stays at 1.20V.
>
> I'm seeing some interesting behavior with the OPP values here, too, with
> suspend/resume. I'm using SRF based PM and CPUFREQ. Here's what happens:
>
> When changing the CPU frequency through the scaling_setfreq knob of
> CPUFREQ, the vdd{1,2}_opp values are updated accordingly. After a
> suspend/resume cycles, the OPPs return to their pre-suspend values, all
> is fine.
>
> But when changing the OPP values by hand through the vdd{1,2}_opp knobs,
> the CPU frequency is changed accordingly, which is expected. But after a
> suspend/resume cycle, the OPP values return to the value CPUFREQ set
> them to (which may be different than the default OPP values of 3).
>
> Is this the normal behavior? Is cpufreq authoritative on the OPP values
> on resume? Or should it follow whatever value was manually set before
> suspending?

FWIW, the vdd*_opp sysfs hooks were for initial debug/dev and should
be considered experimental (a.k.a broken.) They will disappear from
the PM branch shortly.

CPUfreq should be the only interface used for DVFS.

Kevin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-20 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-20 15:47 VDD1 voltage after resume from idle Premi, Sanjeev
2009-11-20 15:48 ` Menon, Nishanth
2009-11-20 15:54   ` Premi, Sanjeev
2009-11-20 15:59     ` Menon, Nishanth
2009-11-20 16:08       ` Premi, Sanjeev
2009-11-20 16:29 ` Maxime Petazzoni
2009-11-20 18:15   ` Premi, Sanjeev
2009-11-20 19:34     ` Premi, Sanjeev
2009-11-23 13:37       ` Premi, Sanjeev
2009-11-20 18:29   ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2009-11-20 18:31     ` Maxime Petazzoni
2009-11-20 18:55     ` Jean Pihet
2009-11-20 19:11       ` Kevin Hilman
2009-11-20 19:19         ` Jean Pihet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87my2h3v9t.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpetazzoni@mvista.com \
    --cc=premi@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.