From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] *clean targets
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:28:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87my40hkmz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091009094809.GH2266@mx.loc> (Bernhard Reutner-Fischer's message of "Fri\, 9 Oct 2009 11\:48\:09 +0200")
>>>>> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> writes:
Hi,
>> * On the clean target
>>
>> I see that all the stamps are removed. So this will trigger
>> basically a reconfigure + rebuild of all packages. Is this what we
>> want ?
Bernhard> yes, this is what i as a user would expect.
Bernhard> Something broke, i have to rebuild stuff, so i
Bernhard> make clean ; make
So in other words, we should just have clean and distclean, where the
only difference between those two is that clean doesn't delete your
.config?
>> Same question as before: is removing the target/ directory without
>> removing the staging/ directory really safe ?
>>
>> Removing $(IMAGE) will not do anything, since $(IMAGE) is the prefix
>> for the filesystem images. I.e, the tar image is $(IMAGE).tar.
Bernhard> the IMAGE was there already. Ask Ulf what it was ment to be.
Ok, but lets really fix up stuff now that we're changing these things.
>> Shouldn't we just remove $(BINARIES_DIR) ?
Bernhard> works for me, but they have to be regenerated anyway, so not
Bernhard> much point, i'd say.
They should imho get removed so the user doesn't get confused if the
build fails, but they still see (old) binaries in BINARIES_DIR.
But ok, moot point if we make clean remove everything.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-09 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-07 16:24 [Buildroot] [RFC] *clean targets Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-10-07 16:32 ` Sven Neumann
2009-10-07 18:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-07 18:25 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-10-07 18:26 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-07 18:31 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-10-07 19:31 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-09 8:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-10-07 18:27 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-10-09 7:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-10-09 8:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-10-09 9:48 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-10-09 11:28 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2009-11-20 13:04 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-11-20 15:28 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-11-20 15:55 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-11-20 16:19 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2009-11-20 16:20 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87my40hkmz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk \
--to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.