From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: reboot-notify additions
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:02:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mylib004.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1K95kd-00081i-B6@eag09.americas.sgi.com> (Cliff Wickman's message of "Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:03:35 -0500")
Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com> writes:
> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
>
> X86 reboot-notify additions.
Doesn't seem x86 specific to me.
> @@ -1068,6 +1071,8 @@ void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (!locked) {
> if (kexec_crash_image) {
> struct pt_regs fixed_regs;
> + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&reboot_notifier_list,
> + SYS_INSANE, NULL);
But you don't really want to block during a crash, do you?
> crash_setup_regs(&fixed_regs, regs);
> crash_save_vmcoreinfo();
> machine_crash_shutdown(&fixed_regs);
> Index: linux/kernel/sys.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/sys.c
> +++ linux/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ out_unlock:
> */
> void emergency_restart(void)
> {
> + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&reboot_notifier_list, SYS_INSANE, NULL);
Here neither.
In fact taking any locks here is dangerous because if you crash holding
such a lock the system will deadlock on panic.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-19 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-18 22:03 [PATCH] X86: reboot-notify additions Cliff Wickman
2008-06-19 3:02 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-06-19 11:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-19 14:54 ` Cliff Wickman
2008-06-19 21:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-06-20 15:16 ` Cliff Wickman
2008-06-20 15:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 18:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-06-20 19:18 ` Cliff Wickman
2008-06-20 21:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-06-20 11:45 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mylib004.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.