From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Green <cmg@dok.org>
Subject: Re: Logging NAT translations?
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 11:42:01 -0400
Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <87n01dzgvq.fsf@ion.xlipstream.com>
References: <87isc7on6q.fsf@ion.xlipstream.com>
	<20040801170153.GC14539@sunbeam2> <87r7qpzi1w.fsf@ion.xlipstream.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/>
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

--=-=-=

Chris Green <cmg@dok.org> writes:
>
> The requirements hierarchy is a pain for me to figure out. Shouldn't
> be too bad to generate a graphviz digraph for it though.

I'm a fool.  Didn't realize that ! meant conflict not obscure
dependency syntax.

I would still appreciate patch management recommendations however :>
-- 
Chris Green <cmg@dok.org>
This is my signature. There are many like it but this one is mine.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBDmDZcTuckgiWJ4oRAjINAKCBVCOxS0Cj96NsVaVZL2ABFLlTsQCfVBNu
vqI1JfnW3ols1YLYcU4RuwY=
=3os8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--