From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03196CDB471 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:38:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=F0Tzd8R50y4K1ChxiSAw8vgrmtFWChCCHv8Cwx7U6Gc=; b=xqwdWxvJL0OeXW oJxFOnicNPyTH5yEYRipkTlzfjeUABNbQygpGLHmqhst5W6FxT0gG0sUZuDk5SpsvhasnvnVvP7wl +8WGgK7a23CqXOTO97cBRcQq0YqOeobzZ5WE/8hdpX2vB2J7Wb9yQD74XIDBgQPSr+AU3KG83m4Wk PvPsjMQrtZCTu9JkUIdoMkwBi/PbEkjY64dA6I9QJwvVvyeAkRV/MBiPz4mXEbUgHkvGjUCjgBr8G CjnkzGdSK78oN9sUSHQtl9XgBVtxFL2Q3+71OOhBNAYsRHflAc7XuojFPGQZ/NIK2N6uRCFc2HjX0 ubeM5HYOQwkv9xKVvbmw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wcMs5-00000007lVx-3z3x; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:38:25 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wcMs3-00000007lVa-1Af1 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:38:24 +0000 From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1782304698; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fUGm+MMcmwFGtPy7Lale2NIYDyisNu79U7nBOET1+5Y=; b=FUrMx08NM8VmDUxmGZEFptBKWTqfsm7CNKV7viI136LvU4KkmA5kFU7gE4y1vAEjC+cPdv 02eFnI2KQAVt+eRTi+5LaPYCW1SA8D5P7iOwB1dOBJAZB5e7x8mOsUQlDdIClXStolmF7x 9DnUFWsayXw3nfeqi3XpmoLTTLwsF8rWxVkNPB9I6GPE7UkefDt+SWhSK+kS4jfR9qo3Nn 5gZETXbOXDdBjowyifdYQlMCQgubnG4x1In4qxX1zl82FJZvcDBnkjohPNsulMFGTjm+Y7 g6vg8/5Zpou97EXKt60wKDjRQnHDtorxf8x1HoZNHn6lNEzRHqKBC7o62bcfFA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1782304698; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fUGm+MMcmwFGtPy7Lale2NIYDyisNu79U7nBOET1+5Y=; b=1V5FcqXB0HrwaHTtBBGbGNODlWgvLMdKb4tlHMdYOnt+IfW0ETwzkzP0X+dbWnA+fckJAv fXjrZNaerK6KAsCA== To: Rui Qi , palmer@dabbelt.com, pjw@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, conor@kernel.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, samuel.holland@sifive.com, Rui Qi Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Fix 32-bit call_on_irq_stack() frame pointer ABI In-Reply-To: <20260624113148.3723541-1-qirui.001@bytedance.com> References: <20260624113148.3723541-1-qirui.001@bytedance.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:38:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87o6h06rly.fsf@yellow.woof> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260624_053823_459147_780807F0 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.76 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org "Rui Qi" writes: > This is a resubmission of Samuel Holland's patch [1] which was > posted in May 2024 but never merged. The bug still exists in the > current tree. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240530001733.1407654-2-samuel.holland@sifive.com/ I don't think we should keep this part in the commit message. And Matthew's Reviewed-by should be included. But I leave that to the maintainers, the diff looks correct to me. Reviewed-by: Nam Cao Nam _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D78275B1A for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782304702; cv=none; b=rUKzjfB+GfgKwhSceOuog+IKrcvaJvSP6+ZpX9XmbQb4cGWDnppwqUiHDqDUBcmzMj3R9xpz7BXe8AWrgrnaSJ8UzdTMmBttCaAjspoz5j5LMUBZJTs9XLfl1VQCUvqPVW/bDH1oujqUlBHkpaj8S5TNPGV3l6lRh8BOPq/sADo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782304702; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fUGm+MMcmwFGtPy7Lale2NIYDyisNu79U7nBOET1+5Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dTH5gjfpDj0dAyLtFPIrb0gALfjCbhza8e1bGg3YQeH5gkBWZ/JJGNcMwrS/vLut6v0Y++XXa969uqzb1nFjIo5veEHmUO8jGxd7O1TojEecsC5/rAXVHe3b3wdbumUaLlTHot8r87pI5Pvn85IS2coS4y71K8C50JViwAid08c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=FUrMx08N; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=1V5FcqXB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="FUrMx08N"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="1V5FcqXB" From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1782304698; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fUGm+MMcmwFGtPy7Lale2NIYDyisNu79U7nBOET1+5Y=; b=FUrMx08NM8VmDUxmGZEFptBKWTqfsm7CNKV7viI136LvU4KkmA5kFU7gE4y1vAEjC+cPdv 02eFnI2KQAVt+eRTi+5LaPYCW1SA8D5P7iOwB1dOBJAZB5e7x8mOsUQlDdIClXStolmF7x 9DnUFWsayXw3nfeqi3XpmoLTTLwsF8rWxVkNPB9I6GPE7UkefDt+SWhSK+kS4jfR9qo3Nn 5gZETXbOXDdBjowyifdYQlMCQgubnG4x1In4qxX1zl82FJZvcDBnkjohPNsulMFGTjm+Y7 g6vg8/5Zpou97EXKt60wKDjRQnHDtorxf8x1HoZNHn6lNEzRHqKBC7o62bcfFA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1782304698; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fUGm+MMcmwFGtPy7Lale2NIYDyisNu79U7nBOET1+5Y=; b=1V5FcqXB0HrwaHTtBBGbGNODlWgvLMdKb4tlHMdYOnt+IfW0ETwzkzP0X+dbWnA+fckJAv fXjrZNaerK6KAsCA== To: Rui Qi , palmer@dabbelt.com, pjw@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, conor@kernel.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, samuel.holland@sifive.com, Rui Qi Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Fix 32-bit call_on_irq_stack() frame pointer ABI In-Reply-To: <20260624113148.3723541-1-qirui.001@bytedance.com> References: <20260624113148.3723541-1-qirui.001@bytedance.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:38:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87o6h06rly.fsf@yellow.woof> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Rui Qi" writes: > This is a resubmission of Samuel Holland's patch [1] which was > posted in May 2024 but never merged. The bug still exists in the > current tree. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240530001733.1407654-2-samuel.holland@sifive.com/ I don't think we should keep this part in the commit message. And Matthew's Reviewed-by should be included. But I leave that to the maintainers, the diff looks correct to me. Reviewed-by: Nam Cao Nam