From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8131AC88A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 09:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753780521; cv=none; b=gWAPX6A8qp17YXodd0+rupJ8SJIjZUEQjQe4AYHVUgtTAl9yxkc+DHt3WU1RegdywuGkOoICn3NKLRohnCF6zS8GtJx6Y1o8dGN4v6nJ7Lqt7kcfEdQIlnfooww4pcc9Xedap2wKkArkCTlW8zjYi86lVI3wIyCrjR2aI0IVuac= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753780521; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aOBZ/tM1Qg2qhkWSPpZFdTdC9lpg4jmKd7J7zCISI44=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PkyHxwRjQxroBwxNVOw3oJfTjTEw7gdQRpO1IEcQU3qKItLkQTmyKUgjJPrnFJptG6G2HQSgwd6otcfVSNU5agyNGTTgB6iCv8YAzPmymie2BMdncXg8JCr7cOm7lsSTau8QmcZzOMOLjQHqqsc/IUHO3oHRKLenSSbdUvFb3Ls= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=j8eldOIx; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=plzSfjVs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="j8eldOIx"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="plzSfjVs" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1753780515; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=b2n5khdBGN4b+rE4+61xpylnCTZ6TU4RaOoD1tcNfbM=; b=j8eldOIxLrtnwJ3NNknKIoL1NjG95KDsIJCFIGJbrcmdgR7vNIYhPcE9zQgZ2sxroFqEan mEG19emzNNgCxGSO03UiBDU8Hto2cgwCevKfYJzzi5y4lbCSlLCg3M+qy+lslYYOIQaj0s S/7RAGBJ7B2Q3UMzKs8G88nx7kPO21AhKJvappLq2dyJ3IbNeGR2y2uAutuLC2jCGi6j1a iBlSjxAy/mfBPpg3JehjItzSlmXbvIKdnNQUGM6dRz2Kp0EE2E3aw0pwSJ6SWtt8tWXMIx hrbyAouSdT9AHRzF/7aMJvlSb/xaWj8oRo1Arjbs8cK1uQxgdMiTGlf1IR0iEA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1753780515; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=b2n5khdBGN4b+rE4+61xpylnCTZ6TU4RaOoD1tcNfbM=; b=plzSfjVsOH4tki0fTO60zHnMFJGjehOx81yiZm4/WDz1jy8qx1PcwsUEvGHGfPEU0PQze9 +iskM/X/V3/kosCg== To: Ahmad Fatoum , Pan Chuang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, angeg.delregno@collabora.com, krzk@kernel.org, frank.li@vivo.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] genirq/devres: Add dev_err_probe() in devm_request_threaded_irq() and devm_request_any_context_irq() In-Reply-To: <73a4fc1d-6852-4050-85c0-8c29b4165e4d@pengutronix.de> References: <20250729081434.497716-1-panchuang@vivo.com> <20250729081434.497716-2-panchuang@vivo.com> <73a4fc1d-6852-4050-85c0-8c29b4165e4d@pengutronix.de> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 11:15:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87o6t3jr31.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 10:20, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > On 29.07.25 10:14, Pan Chuang wrote: >> + return dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "request_irq(%u) %pS %pS %s\n", > > Compared to %ps, %pS also prints offset and size relative to the symbol. > This makes sense when you have an arbitrary program counter, but for > merely printing a function symbol, I'd suggest %ps as it's less noisy. Good point