From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/13] migration: Fix parameter validation
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 14:39:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o6vk5yu3.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r00g61n5.fsf@suse.de>
Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> writes:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 04:14:34PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> The migration parameters validation involves producing a temporary
>>> structure which merges the current parameter values with the new
>>> parameters set by the user.
>>>
>>> The has_ boolean fields of MigrateSetParameter are taken into
>>> consideration when writing the temporary structure, however the copy
>>> of the current parameters also copies all the has_ fields of
>>> s->parameters and those are (almost) all true due to being initialized
>>> by migrate_params_init().
>>>
>>> Since the temporary structure copy does not carry over the has_ fields
>>> from MigrateSetParameters, only the values which were initialized in
>>> migrate_params_init() will end up being validated. This causes
>>> (almost) all of the migration parameters to be validated again every
>>> time a parameter is set, which could be considered a bug. But it also
>>> skips validation of those values which are not set in
>>> migrate_params_init(), which is a worse issue.
>>
>> IMHO it's ok to double check all parameters in slow path. Definitely not
>> ok to skip them.. So now the question is, if migrate_params_test_apply() so
>> far should check all params anyway...
Actually, this doesn't work...
The migrate-set-* commands have optional fields, so we need some form of
checking has_* to know which fields the user is setting. Otherwise
MigrationSetParameters will have zeros all over that will trip the
check.
Then, we need some form of checking has_* to be able to enventually get
the values into s->config (former s->parameters/capabilities), otherwise
we'll overwrite the already-set values with the potentially empty ones
coming from QAPI.
Then there's also the issue of knowing whether a value is 0 because the
user set it 0 or because it was never set.
We also can't apply an invalid value to s->config and validate it after
because some parameters are allowed to be changed during migration.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-22 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-11 19:14 [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] migration: Fix latent bug in migrate_params_test_apply() Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] migration: Normalize tls arguments Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 16:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] migration: Run a post update routine after setting parameters Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 20:42 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] migration: Fix parameter validation Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 20:59 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-22 16:39 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-22 17:39 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2025-05-26 13:09 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-26 15:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] migration: Reduce a bit of duplication in migration.json Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 16:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:02 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-16 13:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-16 14:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-17 5:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-17 18:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-18 6:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] migration: Remove the parameters copy during validation Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] migration: Introduce new MigrationConfig structure Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-18 7:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-23 13:38 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 7:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] migration: Replace s->parameters with s->config Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] migration: Do away with usage of QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] migration: Replace s->capabilities with s->config Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] migration: Merge parameters and capability checks Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] [PoC] migration: Add query/set commands for MigrationConfig Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 7:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-27 22:14 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] [PoC] migration: Allow migrate commands to provide the migration config Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 8:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-26 15:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-14 16:44 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:12 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 17:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:40 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 19:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-15 20:21 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-16 13:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-16 15:00 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-24 9:35 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o6vk5yu3.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.