From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E42CB291E for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721047660; cv=none; b=FuzRTUqyDJ88mnI1tp6Smc3qCVG2SL/I71giagDZyzCrqi3w7oGwtMgRiq0+sD+Xs0bRMWtxtlC/qeQa2RL1HnNJM4x9kyE/731wmz43V9bHkVGFAaxwamB3uKewhhnjVHMisvWWHc54q5+p0hqwORNFrqcB19mAuWyfp0hXRcI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721047660; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9I1oOnHdeQDPPriM/AY5QNoAOHLqsqlQTcuGAFr/R/Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fnw23zvyxLblZTXxQbCo7xonbBHEmPHgV+kANI9RrJPgMKYKSnUFGQlmyZxD3rXsc/dgOCC1QSqmwz3UoxOgrWHy6iIiBTw4MJ8bIBX7KTeteQCpZQYSNVrW0xvC5v3GNcHC06AL6o1T0ApVfQFlO0jketiRqPomp7wKRcS9Bpg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ieQoWpZ/; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=TQJw2MX7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ieQoWpZ/"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="TQJw2MX7" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1721047651; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gud188d0RhjEMW9xxheVMvW5Cyc350/S2inVZljY5Tw=; b=ieQoWpZ/VmqBfzgaY6xmiud+2Sy05rzleH2fWRdtPEl6ynOTEPkfK80X0bQAMzsrBuvaIH rhMlo8pFdtUkP9bloSOV+MmSQeelfSF26GTCrpTiH9YJxs87PBpKQDMspBPQkGHEONsQqy 8Gcg6WEVmXCi7gbgBBIgmruuhY/eH7HV3B7Kjl51AfyITU3l1c6tfenwTIgTJwp4ao6I+G Y0snYgQ9TZVqyucarmLzyoZsHH8FlXT8mbp8R6AxXLos+p6JQQSDjIGXDju2tua7HfBKfZ h8FxbaF77+DG8pHjI0cUjOK0yaR19uJetxyJb5G0NtNYgfmCv9psa3FWLZlMNA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1721047651; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gud188d0RhjEMW9xxheVMvW5Cyc350/S2inVZljY5Tw=; b=TQJw2MX7baLAkvhjsIqZpjerUlU259OAd35jcyFI+J2opzm9JcsilALliXaphnjQX0l5Dc F5PiZAcS5kJUTiAw== To: Johan Hovold Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT pull] irq/core for v6.11-rc1 In-Reply-To: References: <172099001487.1942258.17671805941963584080.tglx@xen13> <172099001665.1942258.758282869896052475.tglx@xen13> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:47:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87o76yrfdo.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Jul 15 2024 at 13:27, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:50:06PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Aside of that it paves the way for ARM/ARM64 to utilize the dynamic >> allocation of PCI/MSI interrupts and to support the upcoming non >> standard IMS (Interrupt Message Store) mechanism on PCIe devices > > This only showed up in linux-next last Friday and broke PCI/MSI > interrupts on Qualcomm machines like the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s as I just > reported here: Bah. It got late into next because we asked people for weeks to test it... > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZpUFl4uMCT8YwkUE@hovoldconsulting.com/ > > I have not had time to debug this further, but it may be worth holding > off on merging until we've taken a closer at look at the breakage. Yes. Linus please ignore that branch for now. Thanks, tglx