All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER"
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	 ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Ath11k warnings, and eventual phy going away requiring reboot
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:30:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7elosip.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6122eb4e-66f5-4772-b211-8fc69ac88ebe@gmail.com> (James Prestwood's message of "Wed, 20 Dec 2023 04:42:31 -0800")

James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Kalle,
>
> On 12/19/23 10:24 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I noticed this after one of our devices dropped offline. The device
>>> had roamed 7 minutes prior so I doubt that had anything to do with it.
>>> But then we get this, and then tons of warnings. I'm happy to provide
>>> full stack traces but its quite a few, not sure which ones are
>>> relevant or not. After all the warnings IWD got an RTNL del link event
>>> and was unable to recover from that. It seems after that ath11k tried
>>> to power back on but failed.
>>>
>>> This is a stock 6.2 ubuntu kernel, WCN6855:
>> BTW I don't know how it's nowadays, but back in the day Ubuntu heavily
>> modified ath11k. And we can't support distro kernels anyway as we don't
>> know what they have changed in the kernel.
>
> Ok. I understand where your coming from, but at the same time Ubuntu
> is the largest linux distribution so it seems like these type of
> reports wouldn't be uncommon. OTOH maybe users just go directly to
> Ubuntu.

Isn't the recommendation that distro kernel bugs should be reported to
distro bug trackers? At least that's what I have understood. At least
our bugzilla says that:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/

> Anyways, this is a list of patches isn't huge according to the
> changelog (for 6.2):
>
>      - wifi: ath11k: fix registration of 6Ghz-only phy without the
> full channel
>      - wifi: ath11k: add support default regdb while searching
> board-2.bin for
>      - wifi: ath11k: fix memory leak in WMI firmware stats
>      - wifi: ath11k: Add missing check for ioremap
>      - wifi: ath11k: Ignore frags from uninitialized peer in dp.
>      - wifi: ath11k: Fix SKB corruption in REO destination ring
>      - wifi: ath11k: reduce the MHI timeout to 20s
>      - wifi: ath11k: Use platform_get_irq() to get the interrupt
>      - wifi: ath11k: fix SAC bug on peer addition with sta band migration
>      - wifi: ath11k: fix deinitialization of firmware resources
>      - wifi: ath11k: fix writing to unintended memory region
>      - wifi: ath11k: Fix memory leak in ath11k_peer_rx_frag_setup
>      - wifi: ath11k: fix monitor mode bringup crash
>      - wifi: ath11k: debugfs: fix to work with multiple PCI devices
>      - wifi: ath11k: allow system suspend to survive ath11k
>
> I see the dilemma of not wanting to waste time debugging when there
> are unknown changes applied. I was hoping someone would recognize the
> behavior and could suggest a patch/kernel/firmware to try

Sure, I also get where you are coming from :) Just wanted to make sure
you know the problem with distro kernels.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches


      reply	other threads:[~2023-12-20 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-19 13:51 Ath11k warnings, and eventual phy going away requiring reboot James Prestwood
2023-12-19 18:24 ` Kalle Valo
2023-12-20 12:42   ` James Prestwood
2023-12-20 14:30     ` Kalle Valo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7elosip.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prestwoj@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.