From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C0EAC10DCE for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC96D10EA45; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6D110EA44; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:59:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1702029590; x=1733565590; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=9zfaRLSGxVe8HCog+7PkeW1tTPz6g2OQj7xOLXUigwc=; b=iPY8BK9lZjX4zrrVGK5cTyfs254/hmRY2CzIuTa90VILWMyk9Uu+PpLR 8AH096JiyFcZHMhM4EMf/6hOAsfPjeyVxxYEeX2hJ/lsyuaxnsVc0GrDs kgJDUXbxbjBn7jOp0LicA5jPb6hvfAjgeM191E4UY/xq09QIDzffBms4J 86nPUdaoJ1LLEWUPKRz29XZsdQDx3/A6JGAJEjreIrLeuFwgzhgv62b8G RAgExYCcOTEfMixhamWi2LOzDAh1KEBA8YYtxONvABCJ0Bpx8+nKnMd4G cZ/q5Ogeyn9AMoCeVtkI3FQfoVZWrTfANRTrVRtXTBloXVSjPYAhPY0DD Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10917"; a="480581417" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,260,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="480581417" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2023 01:59:49 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10917"; a="772078541" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,260,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="772078541" Received: from mvafin-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.63.236]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2023 01:59:46 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: kernel test robot , Andrzej Hajda Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:drm-intel-gt-next] [drm/i915] [confidence: ] 9bb66c179f: assertion_failure In-Reply-To: <202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 11:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7f1ypyo.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jonathan Cavitt , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, oliver.sang@intel.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, Chris Wilson , Nirmoy Das Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Thu, 07 Dec 2023, kernel test robot wrote: > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed "assertion_failure" on: > > commit: 9bb66c179f50e61df20ba13c9b34ca17d00b05fb ("drm/i915: Reserve some kernel space per vm") > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel drm-intel-gt-next > > in testcase: igt So the kernel test robot runs igt. I've seen a handful of reports over the years, but not a whole lot. If you run it even semi-regularly, I would have expected more. What's the deal here? There's clearly overlap with what our CI is doing. Maybe better coordination would be useful? Especially wrt reporting. I'm not sure if anyone's going to track these mails. Cc: Ewelina > version: igt-x86_64-0f075441-1_20230520 That's six months old and more than 1k commits behind. The results are going to be useless, I'm afraid. BR, Jani. > with following parameters: > > group: group-04 > > > > compiler: gcc-12 > test machine: 20 threads 1 sockets (Commet Lake) with 16G memory > > (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace) > > > we also observed below tests failed upon this commit while pass on parent. > > 8aa519f17512da50 9bb66c179f50e61df20ba13c9b3 > ---------------- --------------------------- > fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs > | | | > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.bb-with-allocator.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-noreloc-keep-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-noreloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-reloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.delta-check.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-noreloc-keep-cache-simple.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-noreloc-purge-cache-simple.fail > :6 83% 5:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-reloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.simple-bb-ctx.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.simple-bb.fail > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com > > > [ 43.922756][ T447] > [ 43.935008][ T447] IGT-Version: 1.27.1-g0f075441 (x86_64) (Linux: 6.6.0-rc7-01579-g9bb66c179f50 x86_64) > [ 43.935018][ T447] > [ 43.947248][ T447] Starting subtest: bb-with-allocator > [ 43.947258][ T447] > [ 43.956752][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function __intel_bb_add_object, file ../lib/intel_batchbuffer.c:1673: > [ 43.956762][ T447] > [ 43.974467][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: allocated || reserved > [ 43.974477][ T447] > [ 43.987691][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Can't get offset, allocated: 0, reserved: 0 > [ 43.987706][ T447] > > > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231207/202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com -- Jani Nikula, Intel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A4D5690 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Gka8zrKk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1702029595; x=1733565595; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=9zfaRLSGxVe8HCog+7PkeW1tTPz6g2OQj7xOLXUigwc=; b=Gka8zrKkzTc4X2Fq/z6cf8Hz2ZigEuwRZ0V8lKkT6D9U0u5vp2bY7U+p xFnq7MrL68+twm+o2UsONaSuGE6pDNoEEZccOvxX4noAMigC4zuhjq6lr wMv1VhzC09MtorbujA+bw0u6jUNh7+kHebvka3LdvQvHor5/gi+riOgfD cXcbPM0y4QHggAe+3H8cZ2S2Vs0e1m5pLztR9ZzjcI/fb/QKu6RUN7kWf euezc9kYpnjKiPbrZjbHye7nuiLuDKAGiocHjc19PfRGIsxVyV0kSa2Fh aM8WIWjU2IfqGL9MPY8MoeSVgGlPmaibhNxm16By6NigSBouv4iGPyaSN Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10917"; a="480581419" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,260,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="480581419" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2023 01:59:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10917"; a="772078541" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,260,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="772078541" Received: from mvafin-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.63.236]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2023 01:59:46 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: kernel test robot , Andrzej Hajda Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jonathan Cavitt , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, oliver.sang@intel.com, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, Chris Wilson , Nirmoy Das , "Musial, Ewelina" , Juha-Pekka Heikkila Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:drm-intel-gt-next] [drm/i915] [confidence: ] 9bb66c179f: assertion_failure In-Reply-To: <202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 11:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7f1ypyo.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 07 Dec 2023, kernel test robot wrote: > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed "assertion_failure" on: > > commit: 9bb66c179f50e61df20ba13c9b34ca17d00b05fb ("drm/i915: Reserve some kernel space per vm") > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel drm-intel-gt-next > > in testcase: igt So the kernel test robot runs igt. I've seen a handful of reports over the years, but not a whole lot. If you run it even semi-regularly, I would have expected more. What's the deal here? There's clearly overlap with what our CI is doing. Maybe better coordination would be useful? Especially wrt reporting. I'm not sure if anyone's going to track these mails. Cc: Ewelina > version: igt-x86_64-0f075441-1_20230520 That's six months old and more than 1k commits behind. The results are going to be useless, I'm afraid. BR, Jani. > with following parameters: > > group: group-04 > > > > compiler: gcc-12 > test machine: 20 threads 1 sockets (Commet Lake) with 16G memory > > (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace) > > > we also observed below tests failed upon this commit while pass on parent. > > 8aa519f17512da50 9bb66c179f50e61df20ba13c9b3 > ---------------- --------------------------- > fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs > | | | > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.bb-with-allocator.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-noreloc-keep-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-noreloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-reloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.delta-check.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-noreloc-keep-cache-simple.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-noreloc-purge-cache-simple.fail > :6 83% 5:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-reloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.simple-bb-ctx.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.simple-bb.fail > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com > > > [ 43.922756][ T447] > [ 43.935008][ T447] IGT-Version: 1.27.1-g0f075441 (x86_64) (Linux: 6.6.0-rc7-01579-g9bb66c179f50 x86_64) > [ 43.935018][ T447] > [ 43.947248][ T447] Starting subtest: bb-with-allocator > [ 43.947258][ T447] > [ 43.956752][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function __intel_bb_add_object, file ../lib/intel_batchbuffer.c:1673: > [ 43.956762][ T447] > [ 43.974467][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: allocated || reserved > [ 43.974477][ T447] > [ 43.987691][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Can't get offset, allocated: 0, reserved: 0 > [ 43.987706][ T447] > > > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231207/202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com -- Jani Nikula, Intel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE5EC4167B for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC5910EA44; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6D110EA44; Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:59:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1702029590; x=1733565590; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=9zfaRLSGxVe8HCog+7PkeW1tTPz6g2OQj7xOLXUigwc=; b=iPY8BK9lZjX4zrrVGK5cTyfs254/hmRY2CzIuTa90VILWMyk9Uu+PpLR 8AH096JiyFcZHMhM4EMf/6hOAsfPjeyVxxYEeX2hJ/lsyuaxnsVc0GrDs kgJDUXbxbjBn7jOp0LicA5jPb6hvfAjgeM191E4UY/xq09QIDzffBms4J 86nPUdaoJ1LLEWUPKRz29XZsdQDx3/A6JGAJEjreIrLeuFwgzhgv62b8G RAgExYCcOTEfMixhamWi2LOzDAh1KEBA8YYtxONvABCJ0Bpx8+nKnMd4G cZ/q5Ogeyn9AMoCeVtkI3FQfoVZWrTfANRTrVRtXTBloXVSjPYAhPY0DD Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10917"; a="480581417" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,260,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="480581417" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2023 01:59:49 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10917"; a="772078541" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,260,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="772078541" Received: from mvafin-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.63.236]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2023 01:59:46 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: kernel test robot , Andrzej Hajda Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:drm-intel-gt-next] [drm/i915] [confidence: ] 9bb66c179f: assertion_failure In-Reply-To: <202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 11:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7f1ypyo.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jonathan Cavitt , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, oliver.sang@intel.com, "Musial, Ewelina" , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, Chris Wilson , Nirmoy Das Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Thu, 07 Dec 2023, kernel test robot wrote: > Hello, > > kernel test robot noticed "assertion_failure" on: > > commit: 9bb66c179f50e61df20ba13c9b34ca17d00b05fb ("drm/i915: Reserve some kernel space per vm") > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel drm-intel-gt-next > > in testcase: igt So the kernel test robot runs igt. I've seen a handful of reports over the years, but not a whole lot. If you run it even semi-regularly, I would have expected more. What's the deal here? There's clearly overlap with what our CI is doing. Maybe better coordination would be useful? Especially wrt reporting. I'm not sure if anyone's going to track these mails. Cc: Ewelina > version: igt-x86_64-0f075441-1_20230520 That's six months old and more than 1k commits behind. The results are going to be useless, I'm afraid. BR, Jani. > with following parameters: > > group: group-04 > > > > compiler: gcc-12 > test machine: 20 threads 1 sockets (Commet Lake) with 16G memory > > (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace) > > > we also observed below tests failed upon this commit while pass on parent. > > 8aa519f17512da50 9bb66c179f50e61df20ba13c9b3 > ---------------- --------------------------- > fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs > | | | > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.bb-with-allocator.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-noreloc-keep-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-noreloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.blit-reloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.delta-check.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-noreloc-keep-cache-simple.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-noreloc-purge-cache-simple.fail > :6 83% 5:6 igt.api_intel_bb.object-reloc-purge-cache.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.simple-bb-ctx.fail > :6 100% 6:6 igt.api_intel_bb.simple-bb.fail > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com > > > [ 43.922756][ T447] > [ 43.935008][ T447] IGT-Version: 1.27.1-g0f075441 (x86_64) (Linux: 6.6.0-rc7-01579-g9bb66c179f50 x86_64) > [ 43.935018][ T447] > [ 43.947248][ T447] Starting subtest: bb-with-allocator > [ 43.947258][ T447] > [ 43.956752][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function __intel_bb_add_object, file ../lib/intel_batchbuffer.c:1673: > [ 43.956762][ T447] > [ 43.974467][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: allocated || reserved > [ 43.974477][ T447] > [ 43.987691][ T447] (api_intel_bb:857) intel_batchbuffer-CRITICAL: Can't get offset, allocated: 0, reserved: 0 > [ 43.987706][ T447] > > > The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231207/202312071643.321205c6-oliver.sang@intel.com -- Jani Nikula, Intel