All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Cc: ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/12] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_mb_clear_bb()
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 16:36:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7hng9jp.fsf@doe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919201532.310085-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> writes:

> This patch separates block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in order to
> update block bitmap with ext4_mb_mark_context in following patch.
>
> Separated freeing is safe with concurrent allocation as long as:
> 1. Firstly allocate block in buddy bitmap, and then in block bitmap.
> 2. Firstly free block in block bitmap, and then buddy bitmap.
> Then freed block will only be available to allocation when both buddy
> bitmap and block bitmap are updated by freeing.
> Allocation obeys rule 1 already, just do sperated freeing with rule 2.
>
> Separated freeing has no race with generate_buddy as:
> Once ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp is executed successfully, the update-to-date
> buddy page can be found in sbi->s_buddy_cache and no more buddy
> initialization of the buddy page will be executed concurrently until
> buddy page is unloaded. As we always do free in "load buddy, free,
> unload buddy" sequence, separated freeing has no race with generate_buddy.
>

Agreed. And thanks for adding a separate patch which talks about this
change. 

> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

The patch looks good to me. Please feel free to add - 

Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-27 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-19 20:15 [PATCH v7 00/12] cleanups and unit test for mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] ext4: make state in ext4_mb_mark_bb to be bool Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  6:10   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-27  6:51     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] ext4: factor out codes to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk from ext4_mb_mark_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  8:49   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-28  3:31     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-28  4:42       ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-28  7:45         ` Kemeng Shi
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_free_blocks_simple Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  8:52   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] ext4: extend ext4_mb_mark_context to support allocation under journal Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  9:13   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27  9:58   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_mb_clear_bb() Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:06   ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context in ext4_mb_clear_bb Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:14   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] ext4: Separate block bitmap and buddy bitmap freeing in ext4_group_add_blocks() Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:16   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_context " Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:19   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] ext4: add some kunit stub for mballoc kunit test Kemeng Shi
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] ext4: add first unit test for ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple in mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-09-27 11:39   ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-09-19 20:15 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] ext4: run mballoc test with different layouts setting Kemeng Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7hng9jp.fsf@doe.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.