All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: <paulmck@kernel.org>, <frederic@kernel.org>,
	<josh@joshtriplett.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	<joel@joelfernandes.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<zhangfei.gao@foxmail.com>, <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	<urezki@gmail.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
	<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] srcu: Reduce blocking agressiveness of expedited grace periods further
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:25:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7xlzey3.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220701031545.9868-1-quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>

Hi folks,

On Fri, 01 Jul 2022 04:15:45 +0100,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> wrote:
> 
> Commit 640a7d37c3f4 ("srcu: Block less aggressively for expedited
> grace periods") highlights a problem where aggressively blocking
> SRCU expedited grace periods, as was introduced in commit
> 282d8998e997 ("srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers
> from consuming CPU"), introduces ~2 minutes delay to the overall
> ~3.5 minutes boot time, when starting VMs with "-bios QEMU_EFI.fd"
> cmdline on qemu, which results in very high rate of memslots
> add/remove, which causes > ~6000 synchronize_srcu() calls for
> kvm->srcu SRCU instance.
> 
> Below table captures the experiments done by Zhangfei Gao and Shameer
> to measure the boottime impact with various values of non-sleeping
> per phase counts, with HZ_250 and preemption enabled:
> 
> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
> | SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE   | Boot time (s)  |
> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
> | 100                      | 30.053         |
> | 150                      | 25.151         |
> | 200                      | 20.704         |
> | 250                      | 15.748         |
> | 500                      | 11.401         |
> | 1000                     | 11.443         |
> | 10000                    | 11.258         |
> | 1000000                  | 11.154         |
> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
> 
> Analysis on the experiment results showed improved boot time
> with non blocking delays close to one jiffy duration. This
> was also seen when number of per-phase iterations were scaled
> to one jiffy.
> 
> So, this change scales per-grace-period phase number of non-sleeping
> polls, such that, non-sleeping polls are done for one jiffy. In addition
> to this, srcu_get_delay() call in srcu_gp_end(), which is used to calculate
> the delay used for scheduling callbacks, is replaced with the check for
> expedited grace period. This is done, to schedule cbs for completed expedited
> grace periods immediately, which results in improved boot time seen in
> experiments. Testing done by Marc and Zhangfei confirms that this change recovers
> most of the performance degradation in boottime; for CONFIG_HZ_250 configuration,
> boottime improves from 3m50s to 41s on Marc's setup; and from 2m40s to ~9.7s
> on Zhangfei's setup.
> 
> In addition to the changes to default per phase delays, this change
> adds 3 new kernel parameters - srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay,
> srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay_phase, srcutree.srcu_retry_check_delay.
> This allows users to configure the srcu grace period scanning delays,
> depending on their system configuration requirements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>

Is there any chance for this fix to make it into 5.19? The regression
is significant enough on low-end systems, and I'd rather see it
addressed.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-01  3:15 [PATCH v3] srcu: Reduce blocking agressiveness of expedited grace periods further Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-07-01  4:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-01  5:04   ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-07-01 13:46     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19  8:25 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-07-19 17:15   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-20  7:19     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-20 18:13       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7xlzey3.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@foxmail.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.