From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.1 v2] machine: Disallow specifying topology parameters as zero
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 10:02:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8atcva4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPmWTutShepWX32R@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. Berrangé"'s message of "Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:01:18 +0100")
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:43:26PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
>> In the SMP configuration, we should either specify a topology
>> parameter with a reasonable value (equal to or greater than 1)
>> or just leave it omitted and QEMU will calculate its value.
>> Configurations which explicitly specify the topology parameters
>> as zero like "sockets=0" are meaningless, so disallow them.
>>
>> However, the commit 1e63fe685804d
>> (machine: pass QAPI struct to mc->smp_parse) has documented that
>> '0' has the same semantics as omitting a parameter in the qapi
>> comment for SMPConfiguration. So this patch fixes the doc and
>> also adds the corresponding sanity check in the smp parsers.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> hw/core/machine.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> qapi/machine.json | 6 +++---
>> qemu-options.hx | 12 +++++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
>> index 775add0795..db129d937b 100644
>> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
>> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
>> @@ -829,6 +829,20 @@ static void machine_set_smp(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * The topology parameters must be specified equal to or great than one
>> + * or just omitted, explicit configuration like "cpus=0" is not allowed.
>> + */
>> + if ((config->has_cpus && config->cpus == 0) ||
>> + (config->has_sockets && config->sockets == 0) ||
>> + (config->has_dies && config->dies == 0) ||
>> + (config->has_cores && config->cores == 0) ||
>> + (config->has_threads && config->threads == 0) ||
>> + (config->has_maxcpus && config->maxcpus == 0)) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "parameters must be equal to or greater than one if provided");
>
> I'd suggest a slight tweak since when seen it lacks context:
>
> $ ./qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 4,cores=0,sockets=2
> qemu-system-x86_64: parameters must be equal to or greater than one if provided
>
>
> error_setg(errp, "CPU topology parameters must be equal to or greater than one if provided");
Let's scratch "if provided".
I'd replace "must be equal to or greater than one" by "must be
positive", or maybe "must be greater than zero".
>> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
>> index 99ed5ec5f1..b0168f8c48 100644
>> --- a/qemu-options.hx
>> +++ b/qemu-options.hx
>> @@ -223,11 +223,13 @@ SRST
>> of computing the CPU maximum count.
>>
>> Either the initial CPU count, or at least one of the topology parameters
>> - must be specified. Values for any omitted parameters will be computed
>> - from those which are given. Historically preference was given to the
>> - coarsest topology parameters when computing missing values (ie sockets
>> - preferred over cores, which were preferred over threads), however, this
>> - behaviour is considered liable to change.
>> + must be specified. The specified parameters must be equal to or great
>
> s/great/greater/
>
>> + than one, explicit configuration like "cpus=0" is not allowed. Values
"positive" again.
>> + for any omitted parameters will be computed from those which are given.
>> + Historically preference was given to the coarsest topology parameters
>> + when computing missing values (ie sockets preferred over cores, which
>> + were preferred over threads), however, this behaviour is considered
>> + liable to change.
>> ERST
>
>
> If you make the text changes, then feel free to add this when posting v2:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-23 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-22 15:43 [PATCH for-6.1 v2 0/1] machine: Disallow specifying topology parameters as zero Yanan Wang
2021-07-22 15:43 ` [PATCH for-6.1 v2] " Yanan Wang
2021-07-22 16:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-23 8:02 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2021-07-23 8:40 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-23 8:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-22 16:15 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-22 22:25 ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-23 1:57 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-23 14:14 ` Cleber Rosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8atcva4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.