From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] Documentation/admin-guide: Change doc for split_lock_detect parameter
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 23:09:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8hadobh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124205245.4164633-5-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 24 2020 at 20:52, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Since #DB for bus lock detect changes the split_lock_detect parameter,
> update the documentation for the changes.
Why is this seperate and an all in one thing? patch 2/4 changes the
parameter first and 3/4 adds a new option....
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> ---
> Change Log:
> v4:
> - Fix a ratelimit wording issue in the doc (Randy).
> - Patch 4 is acked by Randy (Randy).
>
> v3:
> - Enable Bus Lock Detection when fatal to handle bus lock from non-WB
> (PeterZ).
>
> v1:
> - Fix a few wording issues (Randy).
>
> RFC v2:
> - Simplify the documentation (Randy).
>
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 30 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 44fde25bb221..28228539b02a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5051,27 +5051,45 @@
> spia_peddr=
> +
> + ratelimit:N -
> + Set rate limit to N bus locks per second
> + for bus lock detection. 0 < N <= HZ/2.
Oh well. So if I have ratelimit:500 on the kernel command line and then
this works for CONFIG_HZ=1000, but after rebuilding the kernel with
HZ=250 it fails. What?
If I allow 500 hits per second then CONFIG_HZ has absolutely nothing to
do with it. A second stays a second independent of CONFIG_HZ.
So what's the purpose of this HZ business?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-27 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 20:52 [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Enable bus lock detection Fenghua Yu
2020-11-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate #DB for " Fenghua Yu
2021-01-27 21:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-01-27 22:39 ` Yu, Fenghua
2021-01-27 23:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/bus_lock: Handle warn and fatal in #DB for bus lock Fenghua Yu
2021-01-27 21:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/bus_lock: Set rate limit " Fenghua Yu
2021-01-27 21:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-24 20:52 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] Documentation/admin-guide: Change doc for split_lock_detect parameter Fenghua Yu
2021-01-27 22:09 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-12-02 20:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Enable bus lock detection Yu, Fenghua
2021-01-04 19:42 ` Fenghua Yu
2021-01-25 19:27 ` Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8hadobh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.