From: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] overlayfs: Provide a mount option "volatile" to skip sync
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 20:42:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8kamfuo.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106190325.GB1445528@redhat.com> (Vivek Goyal's message of "Fri, 6 Nov 2020 14:03:25 -0500")
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:58:39AM -0800, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>
> [..]
>> There is some slightly confusing behaviour here [I realize this
>> behaviour is as intended]:
>>
>> (root) ~ # mount -t overlay -o
>> volatile,index=off,lowerdir=/root/lowerdir,upperdir=/root/upperdir,workdir=/root/workdir
>> none /mnt/foo
>> (root) ~ # umount /mnt/foo
>> (root) ~ # mount -t overlay -o
>> volatile,index=off,lowerdir=/root/lowerdir,upperdir=/root/upperdir,workdir=/root/workdir
>> none /mnt/foo
>> mount: /mnt/foo: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on none,
>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
>>
>> From my understanding, the dirty flag should only be a problem if the
>> existing overlayfs is unmounted uncleanly. Docker does
>> this (mount, and re-mounts) during startup time because it writes some
>> files to the overlayfs. I think that we should harden
>> the volatile check slightly, and make it so that within the same boot,
>> it's not a problem, and having to have the user clear
>> the workdir every time is a pain. In addition, the semantics of the
>> volatile patch itself do not appear to be such that they
>> would break mounts during the same boot / mount of upperdir -- as
>> overlayfs does not defer any writes in itself, and it's
>> only that it's short-circuiting writes to the upperdir.
>
> umount does a sync normally and with "volatile" overlayfs skips that
> sync. So a successful unmount does not mean that file got synced
> to backing store. It is possible, after umount, system crashed
> and after reboot, user tried to mount upper which is corrupted
> now and overlay will not detect it.
>
> You seem to be asking for an alternate option where we disable
> fsync() but not syncfs. In that case sync on umount will still
> be done. And that means a successful umount should mean upper
> is fine and it could automatically remove incomapt dir upon
> umount.
could this be handled in user space? It should still be possible to do
the equivalent of:
# sync -f /root/upperdir
# rm -rf /root/workdir/incompat/volatile
Regards,
Giuseppe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-31 18:15 [PATCH v7] overlayfs: Provide a mount option "volatile" to skip sync Vivek Goyal
2020-09-01 8:22 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-09-01 13:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 17:58 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-06 19:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-06 19:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 17:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 17:25 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-09 19:39 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-09 20:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 19:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-06 19:42 ` Giuseppe Scrivano [this message]
2020-11-07 9:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-07 11:52 ` Sargun Dhillon
2020-11-09 20:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 8:53 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2020-11-09 10:10 ` Amir Goldstein
2020-11-09 16:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 17:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-11-09 17:20 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8kamfuo.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=gscrivan@redhat.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.