From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20200907130938.416831-1-rpm@xenomai.org> <20200907130938.416831-5-rpm@xenomai.org> From: Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] x86/ipipe: fix build with CONFIG_X86_UV enabled In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:11:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8mhaagh.fsf@xenomai.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Jan Kiszka writes: > On 07.09.20 15:09, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> From: Philippe Gerum >> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Gerum >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c >> index 3f3afcecc1b9..c5ebfdf2dfb3 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c >> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ void smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs); >> void smp_reboot_interrupt(void); >> void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs); >> void smp_threshold_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs); >> +void uv_bau_message_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs); >> >> void __ipipe_do_IRQ(unsigned int irq, void *cookie); >> >> > > IIRC, I broke that intentionally. There is more needed, and no one > should get something building but subtly not working. But we may better do > > depends on !IPIPE > Indeed, otherwise plain build tests with e.g. allyesconfig fail miserably. -- Philippe.