From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dZyNQ-0006os-AG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:51:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dZyNN-0002Df-Ah for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:51:48 -0400 Received: from roura.ac.upc.es ([147.83.33.10]:49747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dZyNM-0002Cm-Uc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:51:45 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs_Vilanova?= References: <150091574424.30739.4131793221953168474.stgit@frigg.lan> <150091841019.30739.3661641061220051037.stgit@frigg.lan> <109e1849-1bf6-5875-b304-7cacbf45f068@redhat.com> <87wp6wgbzw.fsf@frigg.lan> <3a8accf6-2805-e2fa-1d58-1db85558c7a5@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:51:31 +0300 In-Reply-To: <3a8accf6-2805-e2fa-1d58-1db85558c7a5@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Tue, 25 Jul 2017 06:30:42 -0500") Message-ID: <87o9s8enuk.fsf@frigg.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/13] instrument: [qapi] Add library loader List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Emilio G. Cota" , Markus Armbruster , Stefan Hajnoczi Eric Blake writes: > On 07/25/2017 03:24 AM, Llu=C3=ADs Vilanova wrote: >> Eric Blake writes: >>=20 >>> On 07/24/2017 12:46 PM, Llu=C3=ADs Vilanova wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Llu=C3=ADs Vilanova >>>> --- >>>> instrument/Makefile.objs | 1 + >>>> instrument/qmp.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> qapi-schema.json | 3 ++ >>>> qapi/instrument.json | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++++ >>>> 4 files changed, 167 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 instrument/qmp.c >>>> create mode 100644 qapi/instrument.json >>=20 >>> Adding new files; but I don't see a patch to MAINTAINERS to cover >>> instrument/*. >>=20 >> Who should I put as a maintainer? Or does this go to the general maintai= ner(s)? > You can be the maintainer if you'd like; or see if Stefan is okay > including it as part of the trace files, since it trace-related. I can certainly do that. I was just wondering if the project prefers to have someone on the "core team" as a maintainer. Stefan? Thanks, Lluis