All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com (Felipe Balbi)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: dwc3: add support for hardware with multiple ports on USB2 hub enabled
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 14:16:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o9zgtoms.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCAgO5MmhGuk8yssGsxCHeXRcJxirDNcOjeNg5RaV_ZRwA@mail.gmail.com>


Hi,

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
>>>>>>> When searching the web I did not come across any SoC that uses a
>>>>>>> configuration with more than one port enabled.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On my Amlogic Meson GXM device (consumer device, no development board)
>>>>>>> I see the following USB2 PHY register configuration (full register
>>>>>>> dump from the kernel that was shipped with the device is attached):
>>>>>>> GUSB2PHYCFG(0) = 0x40102500
>>>>>>> GUSB2PHYCFG(1) = 0x40102540
>>>>>>> GUSB2PHYCFG(2) = 0x40102540
>>>>>>
>>>>>> multiple PHYs are only used by the host block (xHCI). Don't touch these
>>>>>> and just let xHCI core handle the ports.
>>>>> could you be more specific with "xHCI core" - do you mean the core in
>>>>> the dwc3 IP or drivers/usb/host/xhci-*?
>>>>> However, we still have a "problem" here: the USB PHYs for each
>>>>> "enabled" port have to be turned on (if I leave only one USB PHY
>>>>> disabled then none of the ports is working). unfortunately the current
>>>>> code (both, in dwc3 and drivers/usb/host/*) assumes that there's
>>>>> either 0 or 1 PHY for each HCD.
>>
>> true. But even so, that PHY handle is only needed for devices which
>> weren't properly configured at coreConsultant time.
> I don't understand that - there are two separate modules involved
> here: 1. the dwc3 IP block 2. Amlogic's own USB2 PHYs (they did not
> choose Synopsys DesignWare PHYs)
> (some background info: the USB2 PHYs are in "reset mode" by default)
> So even if the dwc3 IP block is configured correctly at coreConsultant
> time we still need to configure the PHYs. From "USB controller driver"
> (could be dwc3, or some generic hcd.c code, etc.) this means that
> phy_init() and phy_power_on() needs to be called for each of the three
> "Amlogic USB2 PHYs". the current code however only calls these for the
> first PHY (leaving the others in reset mode = disabled).

argh, good point. In that case, we need to figure out the best way to
pass all these handles to xHCI-plat

>>>>>>> Then vendor kernel sources (a 3.14 kernel) are adding the resets for
>>>>>>> GUSB2PHYCFG([1-3]) in dwc3_core_soft_reset().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That shouldn't be necessary, actually. If it is, it means the HW was
>>>>>> poorly integrated. In that case, we _can_ add the other resets, but I
>>>>>> need confirmation that they are needed by means of a public errata
>>>>>> document.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A mainline 4.9+(Meson GXL USB PHY patches + dwc3/xhci-plat DMA patches
>>>>>>> from linux-usb) kernel works fine even with just applying the reset to
>>>>>>> GUSB2PHYCFG(0).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there you go
>>>>> does that mean that the reset of GUSB2PHYCFG(0) (which is part of the
>>>>> current dwc3 code in dwc3_phy_setup) is done only because of the
>>>>> quirks/erratas? in other words: do you mean that one would not have to
>>>>> reset GUSB2PHYCFG(0) if there were no erratas?
>>>>
>>>> no, it's done for peripheral configuration of dwc3. Look at the code
>>>> more carefully:
>>> sorry for the confusion - the word "reset" should be "configuration".
>>> The function I am looking at is dwc3_phy_setup(): apart from toggling
>>> some "errata bits" it also configures the PHY modes. I am wondering if
>>> I need to do this setup (DWC3_GUSB2PHYCFG_ULPI_UTMI and
>>> DWC3_GUSB2PHYCFG_PHYIF_MASK related bits) not only for the *first*
>>> port ("DWC3_GUSB2PHYCFG(0)") but also for the "other" ports (index 1
>>> and 2 in above case, where the roothub has 3 ports)
>>
>> Ideally, that should've been set at coreConsultant (RTL instantiation)
>> time. If it wasn't, then we need to add a quirk for these SoCs
>> accordingly. We _do_ need documentation that this quirk is, indeed,
>> needed.
> That is an explanation I'm fine with: we trust the (default) values
> which are in hardware until we have documentation that we need a
> quirk. I do not have access to Amlogic's documentation so I can't
> provide that - but we can probably leave it as it is as it "worked for
> me".

awesome, so we need *only* phy_init() / phy_power_on() for the other
PHYs, right?

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-amlogic/attachments/20170109/7482a1b7/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-27 13:02 dwc3: add support for hardware with multiple ports on USB2 hub enabled Martin Blumenstingl
2016-11-27 13:05 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-01-08 23:15   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-01-09 10:37 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-01-09 11:05   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-01-09 11:18     ` Felipe Balbi
2017-01-09 11:50       ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-01-09 11:55         ` Felipe Balbi
2017-01-09 12:14           ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-01-09 12:16             ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2017-01-09 12:35               ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-01-09 12:39                 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-01-09 12:55                   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2017-01-09 13:05                     ` Felipe Balbi
2017-01-11 15:35                       ` Martin Blumenstingl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o9zgtoms.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.