From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCmOL-0007Kf-1D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:20:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCmOH-0007Ms-3b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:20:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCmOG-0007Mo-Tq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:20:17 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6845A37E62 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:20:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <1465855078-19435-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <1465855078-19435-4-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <87d1nkkv07.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:20:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:11:42 +0200") Message-ID: <87oa74f24x.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] coccinelle: Remove unnecessary variables for function return value List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 14/06/2016 10:57, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/return_directly.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/return_directly.cocci >>> > new file mode 100644 >>> > index 0000000..c52f4fc >>> > --- /dev/null >>> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/return_directly.cocci >>> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ >>> > +// replace 'R = X; return R;' with 'return R;' >>> > + >>> > +// remove assignment >> Second comment feels redundant. Can drop on commit to error-next. >> >>> > +@ removal @ >> Rule name "removal" is not used. Can drop on commit to error-next. >> > > I've seen rule names used as a comment. Feels a bit like COBOL, but it > doesn't hurt. Perhaps rename it to "@ return_directly @"? No objection. However, the existing semantic patches in scripts/coccinelle/ don't do that. You guys tell me what to do with this one.