From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Thulasimani, Sivakumar" <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 4/5] drm/i915: move VBT based DSI presence check to intel_bios.c
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 17:16:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oabpdidm.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B808DD.5050504@intel.com>
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016, "Thulasimani, Sivakumar" <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> wrote:
> On 2/5/2016 4:06 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Hide knowledge about VBT child devices in intel_bios.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 234f33708a31..cd2595c25f8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -1516,7 +1516,6 @@ struct intel_vbt_data {
>>
>> /* MIPI DSI */
>> struct {
>> - u16 port;
>> u16 panel_id;
>> struct mipi_config *config;
>> struct mipi_pps_data *pps;
>> @@ -3400,6 +3399,7 @@ bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size);
>> bool intel_bios_is_tv_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 *i2c_pin);
>> bool intel_bios_is_port_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port);
>> +bool intel_bios_is_dsi_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port *port);
>>
>> /* intel_opregion.c */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> index 1429d8214885..b0cf33234c33 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> @@ -1237,7 +1237,6 @@ parse_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> &&p_child->common.device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_MIPI_OUTPUT) {
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Found MIPI as LFP\n");
>> dev_priv->vbt.has_mipi = 1;
>> - dev_priv->vbt.dsi.port = p_child->common.dvo_port;
>> }
>>
>> child_dev_ptr = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + count;
>> @@ -1552,3 +1551,35 @@ bool intel_bios_is_port_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port port)
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * intel_bios_is_dsi_present - is DSI present in VBT
>> + * @dev_priv: i915 device instance
>> + * @port: port for DSI if present
>> + *
>> + * Return true if DSI is present, and return the port in %port.
>> + */
>> +bool intel_bios_is_dsi_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> + enum port *port)
>> +{
>> + union child_device_config *p_child;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num; i++) {
>> + p_child = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + i;
>> +
>> + if (!(p_child->common.device_type & DEVICE_TYPE_MIPI_OUTPUT))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + switch (p_child->common.dvo_port) {
>> + case DVO_PORT_MIPIA:
>> + case DVO_PORT_MIPIB:
>> + case DVO_PORT_MIPIC:
>> + case DVO_PORT_MIPID:
>> + *port = p_child->common.dvo_port - DVO_PORT_MIPIA;
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> + }
> can we add platform check & vbt.has_mipi check ? it will avoid the need
> to loop through the array.
I'm actually going to remove has_mipi altogether as unnecessary
duplication of information. We run the loop very few times anyway. Also,
I don't want to duplicate the information about platforms, that stuff is
in intel_setup_outputs and in the encoder inits. Single point of truth.
> Also since all platforms so far (VLV/CHV/BXT) has only MIPI A & MIPI C
> is B & D needed here ? we can directly fail here for unsupported ports
> rather than in dsi_init as special check.
Agreed.
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> index 378f879f4015..5b6ec567e3ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> @@ -1112,9 +1112,15 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>>
>> /* There is no detection method for MIPI so rely on VBT */
>> - if (!dev_priv->vbt.has_mipi)
>> + if (!intel_bios_is_dsi_present(dev_priv, &port))
>> return;
>>
>> + if (port != PORT_A && port != PORT_C) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("VBT has unsupported DSI port %c\n",
>> + port_name(port));
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev)) {
>> dev_priv->mipi_mmio_base = VLV_MIPI_BASE;
>> } else {
>> @@ -1153,16 +1159,15 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>> intel_connector->unregister = intel_connector_unregister;
>>
>> /* Pipe A maps to MIPI DSI port A, pipe B maps to MIPI DSI port C */
>> - if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.port == DVO_PORT_MIPIA) {
>> - intel_encoder->crtc_mask = (1 << PIPE_A);
>> - intel_dsi->ports = (1 << PORT_A);
>> - } else if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.port == DVO_PORT_MIPIC) {
>> - intel_encoder->crtc_mask = (1 << PIPE_B);
>> - intel_dsi->ports = (1 << PORT_C);
>> - }
>> + if (port == PORT_A)
>> + intel_encoder->crtc_mask = 1 << PIPE_A;
>> + else
>> + intel_encoder->crtc_mask = 1 << PIPE_B;
>>
> The above limitation applies only to CHT/VLV.
True, but I'm again reluctant to make the change at this point. It
should be added as part of BXT DSI instead.
BR,
Jani.
>> if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.config->dual_link)
>> - intel_dsi->ports = ((1 << PORT_A) | (1 << PORT_C));
>> + intel_dsi->ports = (1 << PORT_A) | (1 << PORT_C);
>> + else
>> + intel_dsi->ports = 1 << port;
>>
>> /* Create a DSI host (and a device) for each port. */
>> for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-05 10:36 [PATCH RESEND 1/5] drm/i915: move VBT based TV presence check to intel_bios.c Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 10:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] drm/i915: move VBT based LVDS " Jani Nikula
2016-02-08 3:00 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-02-09 15:12 ` Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 10:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] drm/i915: move VBT based eDP port " Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 10:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/5] drm/i915: move VBT based DSI presence " Jani Nikula
2016-02-08 3:17 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-02-09 15:16 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2016-02-05 10:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/5] drm/i915/panel: setup pwm backlight based on connector type Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 11:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915: move VBT based TV presence check to intel_bios.c Patchwork
2016-02-08 2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/5] " Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-02-09 15:18 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oabpdidm.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.