From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Monakhov Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: Add fdatasync scalability optimization Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:25:54 +0400 Message-ID: <87oateq4e5.fsf@openvz.org> References: <1413281035-6483-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <1413281035-6483-5-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20141014105729.GA19981@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141014105729.GA19981@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christoph Hellwig writes: > Much of the bookkeeping here seems generic and should be in common > code and not inside a filesystem. Yes. But this means that I need to store flush_id inside generic inode which likely will be accepted negatively because VFS people do not like inode bloating. But if you are OK then I'll prepare the patch. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUPQhCAAoJEFzOBSYIXfve40gP+wfx5+x6c6NEMQ2n7LdBumCC 0I5/G9gBV2SRFjf7tvbW7jW3U5qrfjUZizTOGBvcoX9zt35ClMKMUWvTqBHHaN2+ Zix9kdXhFheKKvuKR0II4lwh2kYIAoosfqwYTOX6RWtdFbul66rPynU0+KTSEbay VZLrZZ38TQuDgIvrmAwbwnINX6/ZIs9KwQQS63OT6og4SWsqj5lo+tVEoAQdAeKV 5pDVYo0sO6R2OqF9pi+BPBI+4jNXNV7RH17Swj3PUJLsjB0jOehrIPw9FS13vXdK JW+d7A9tv47lwrp+Z7BUPQx/u40DxIIiTpjbMVi+tutgNmT4VnXr9j4odFK1SbSO 3BRB0BpgvL9YPBBiHKGarHkgvZ/MDkNEbufoSQhL6PFKF40tcBT4gnTbmB0f5EJM 3LaHUIfonPpyJ8ziYNKAa+yFi+epAWOZnQUjfQhoek2s4l70TOZk+z+J9zr08VKg NCmLRPhMEULgdO6RkHnwNC/rhQMId3s6TKXxqXbKGN9vgtS1rLkb/cEgR5opIcg9 9PpxdN0xhctclsAElk7LZUpK4KA7hzFr51IG3BnzACBd0x9h6DcJ+mYRAYYaEwBO SQy8Y9dy1VCcPrcwX3xWtwt3Su0OjVxSg42W71eg396cll1LZLgV24MAQFC89mBh YfplMyeM5u4b+A3i2DCt =j/Z9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--