From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:08:38 -0800 Message-ID: <87ob2ls4op.fsf@paris.lan> References: <1391529538-21685-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <1391529538-21685-6-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <8738jyu1h9.fsf@paris.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Linus Walleij's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:49:49 +0100") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Ulf Hansson , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Alessandro Rubini , Wolfram Sang , Chris Ball , Mark Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Linus Walleij writes: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Ulf Hansson writes: >> >>> Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our >>> device into low power state at system suspend. > (...) >> I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make PM_SLEEP depend on >> PM_RUNTIME for platforms like this. > > Isn't the typical Android platform using PM_SLEEP without using > PM_RUNTIME? No, most Android platforms that I'm aware of use both extensively. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:08:38 -0800 Message-ID: <87ob2ls4op.fsf@paris.lan> References: <1391529538-21685-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <1391529538-21685-6-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <8738jyu1h9.fsf@paris.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Ulf Hansson , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" , Alessandro Rubini , Wolfram Sang , Chris Ball , Mark Brown , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c\@vger.kernel.org" , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-mmc\@vger.kernel.org" To: Linus Walleij Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Linus Walleij's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:49:49 +0100") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Linus Walleij writes: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Ulf Hansson writes: >> >>> Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our >>> device into low power state at system suspend. > (...) >> I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make PM_SLEEP depend on >> PM_RUNTIME for platforms like this. > > Isn't the typical Android platform using PM_SLEEP without using > PM_RUNTIME? No, most Android platforms that I'm aware of use both extensively. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:08:38 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 05/17] mmc: mmci: Put the device into low power state at system suspend In-Reply-To: (Linus Walleij's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:49:49 +0100") References: <1391529538-21685-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <1391529538-21685-6-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <8738jyu1h9.fsf@paris.lan> Message-ID: <87ob2ls4op.fsf@paris.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Linus Walleij writes: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Ulf Hansson writes: >> >>> Due to the available runtime PM callbacks, we are now able to put our >>> device into low power state at system suspend. > (...) >> I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make PM_SLEEP depend on >> PM_RUNTIME for platforms like this. > > Isn't the typical Android platform using PM_SLEEP without using > PM_RUNTIME? No, most Android platforms that I'm aware of use both extensively. Kevin