From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [RFC] drm/i915: Non-upstream ChromeOS patches from 3.8 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:15:16 +0300 Message-ID: <87ob8ygigb.fsf@intel.com> References: <1376613069-15790-1-git-send-email-james.ausmus@intel.com> <20130816062430.GF776@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD8CE637E for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 01:13:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130816062430.GF776@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter , james.ausmus@intel.com Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 05:30:25PM -0700, james.ausmus@intel.com wrote: >> Hello All- >> >> I'm trying to determine if the ChromeOS-only patches being carried by >> Google still make sense and are the right way to do things in the 3.11+ >> world, and Jesse asked me to forward the patches to the list for evaluation >> and potential upstreaming. > > I've quickly read through the pile here and there's a few things we > need to look at. Ditto, and agreed. > But one thing which makes assessing the patches here a bit a pain is > that often there's a fixup later on again. Another pain is that sometimes the fixup is first, i.e. the series does not seem to be in the right order. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center