From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: Callgraph like kcachegrind Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 09:27:47 +0900 Message-ID: <87obntlon0.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> References: <20120705004428.GA17035@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.111]:54674 "EHLO LGEMRELSE1Q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932852Ab2GFAbo (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:31:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120705004428.GA17035@infradead.org> (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's message of "Wed, 4 Jul 2012 21:44:28 -0300") Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Christoph Bartoschek , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arun Sharma On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 21:44:28 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:59:39PM +0200, Christoph Bartoschek escreveu: >> is it somehow possible to get a callgraph like gets it from kcachegrind? >> >> I tried to use -g/-G on a program that runs but the information is not as >> expected. I do not see how the 100% runtime of main() is distributed. > > This is a feature we should have, but till then I think there is a > script out there that does that, lemme try to google that, gack, I know > there is one, but 'perf tools' really isn't google friendly, anyone? > I saw Arun posted a kind of cumulative (or inclusive) call graph patch long ago. I guess it'd be the first step to have the feature like above. And IIRC Ingo wanted to have it too. Arun, what's the state of the patch? Thanks, Namhyung