From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:03:22 +1030 Message-ID: <87obw31v31.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1319536106-25802-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <874nywpfkd.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Brian Swetland , Grant Likely , Tony Lindgren , Russell King List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:40:04 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > At this point I know of at least four vendors (besides TI) who are > actively looking into supporting this, and it's getting a bit hard to > collaborate, so I plan to get this into linux-next later this week > (minus the virtio-spec.txt change which I'll send directly to you, > Rusty) in the hope of getting this merged into 3.3. Good. Thanks. > >, but no objections here > > Can I add your Acked-by on the virtio parts (mainly patches 3 and 6) ? That would imply that I'd done more than glance over them, and unfortunately I haven't :( Thanks, Rusty. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rusty@rustcorp.com.au (Rusty Russell) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:03:22 +1030 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework In-Reply-To: References: <1319536106-25802-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <874nywpfkd.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Message-ID: <87obw31v31.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:40:04 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > At this point I know of at least four vendors (besides TI) who are > actively looking into supporting this, and it's getting a bit hard to > collaborate, so I plan to get this into linux-next later this week > (minus the virtio-spec.txt change which I'll send directly to you, > Rusty) in the hope of getting this merged into 3.3. Good. Thanks. > >, but no objections here > > Can I add your Acked-by on the virtio parts (mainly patches 3 and 6) ? That would imply that I'd done more than glance over them, and unfortunately I haven't :( Thanks, Rusty.