From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] OMAP: omap_device: deactivate latency typo Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:39:02 -0800 Message-ID: <87ocmzew3d.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1258506313-17115-1-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> <1258506313-17115-2-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> <1258506313-17115-3-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> <1258506313-17115-4-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> <1258506313-17115-5-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:57386 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757273AbZKROi6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:38:58 -0500 Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so721196pwi.21 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:39:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Paul Walmsley's message of "Wed\, 18 Nov 2009 03\:54\:10 -0700 \(MST\)") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Paul Walmsley writes: > Hello Kevin, > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> The deactivate hook should use 'deactivate_lat' instead of >> 'activate_lat' when doing checking on expected latency values. > > Why ? > Hmm, looking closer, I think misunderstood the use of 'activate_lat' in the deactivate hook. I'll drop this one. Kevin