From: Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:27:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ocvyvlsd.fsf@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903181657180.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de> (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed\, 18 Mar 2009 17\:01\:31 +0100 \(CET\)")
On 2009-03-18 17:01 (+0100), Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> The default was not to change the window or depth at all. As
>> suggested by Jon Smirl, Linus Torvalds and others, default to
>>
>> --window=250 --depth=250
> Guess what. This is still unresolved, and yet somebody else had to be
> bitten by 'git gc --aggressive' being everything but aggressive.
Pieter de Bie's tests seem to suggest that usually --window=50
--depth=50 gives about the same results than with higher values:
http://vcscompare.blogspot.com/2008/06/git-repack-parameters.html
I don't understand the issue very well myself so I really can't say what
would be a/the good value. Anyway, I agree that it would be nice if "git
gc --aggressive" were aggressive and a user wouldn't need to know about
"git repack" and its cryptical low-levelish options.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4aca3dc20712051108s216d3331t8061ef45b9aa324a@mail.gmail.com>
2007-12-06 2:28 ` Git and GCC David Miller
2007-12-06 2:41 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-06 2:52 ` David Miller
2007-12-06 3:47 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-06 4:20 ` David Miller
2007-12-06 4:28 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-06 4:32 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-06 4:48 ` David Miller
2007-12-06 5:11 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-06 5:15 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-06 5:17 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-06 6:47 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-06 7:15 ` Jeff King
2007-12-06 14:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-06 17:39 ` Jeff King
2007-12-06 18:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-07 6:50 ` Jeff King
2007-12-07 7:27 ` Jeff King
2007-12-06 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-06 18:55 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-06 19:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-06 21:39 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-06 22:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-06 22:11 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-06 22:22 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-06 22:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-06 22:44 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-07 7:31 ` Jeff King
2007-12-08 0:47 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-10 9:54 ` Gabriel Paubert
2007-12-10 15:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-07 3:31 ` David Miller
2007-12-07 6:38 ` Jeff King
2007-12-07 7:10 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-07 12:53 ` David Miller
2007-12-07 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-07 20:26 ` Giovanni Bajo
2007-12-07 22:14 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-12-07 23:04 ` Luke Lu
2007-12-07 23:14 ` Giovanni Bajo
2007-12-07 23:33 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-08 12:00 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-08 1:55 ` David Miller
2007-12-10 9:57 ` David Miller
2007-12-06 6:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-06 7:49 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-06 8:11 ` David Brown
2007-12-06 14:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-06 12:03 ` [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-06 13:42 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-06 14:15 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-06 14:22 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-12-06 15:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-06 17:05 ` David Kastrup
2007-12-06 15:30 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-06 15:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-06 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-18 16:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-18 16:27 ` Teemu Likonen [this message]
2009-03-18 18:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-06 18:04 ` Git and GCC Daniel Berlin
2007-12-06 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-07 2:42 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-07 3:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-07 4:06 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-07 4:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-07 5:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-07 7:08 ` Jon Smirl
2007-12-07 19:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-12-06 18:24 ` NightStrike
2007-12-06 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-07 5:36 ` NightStrike
2007-12-06 19:12 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-12-06 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-07 0:29 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-12-06 20:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-12-06 21:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-12-06 22:26 ` David Kastrup
2007-12-06 22:38 ` [OT] " Randy Dunlap
2007-12-06 4:25 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-06 4:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-06 5:04 ` Harvey Harrison
2007-12-06 11:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-06 12:04 ` Ismail Dönmez
[not found] ` <2007-12-05-21-23-14+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net>
[not found] ` <1196891451.10408.54.camel@brick>
[not found] ` <jeeje0ogvk.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
[not found] ` <1196897840.10408.57.camel@brick>
[not found] ` <38a0d8450712130640p1b5d74d6nfa124ad0b0110d64@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1197572755.898.15.camel@brick>
2007-12-17 22:15 ` "Argument list too long" in git remote update (Was: Git and GCC) Geert Bosch
2007-12-17 22:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-12-17 23:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-12-18 1:34 ` Derek Fawcus
2007-12-18 1:52 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-12-06 19:07 [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive J.C. Pizarro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ocvyvlsd.fsf@iki.fi \
--to=tlikonen@iki.fi \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.