All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev,  robh@kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,  devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] arm64: dts: nuvoton: ma35d1: Add LXT crystal and correct HXT name
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 22:48:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pkxv4wd8.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929150121.739D91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (sashiko-bot@kernel.org's message of "Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:01:20 +0000")


>> -		clock-output-names = "clk_hxt";
>> +		clock-output-names = "hxt";
>
> [Severity: High]
> Could this change cause a regression with older kernels?
>
> When booting an older kernel with this newly updated Device Tree,

I don't think we should bother too much about forward compatibility, do
we? I will set the name back to the weird "clk_hxt"/"clk_lxt" string,
because I don't want to fight. This was supposedly a 1 patch fixing the
SPI controller driver behaviour, we now are at 9 after 5 versions. So it
is time to settle. I find the "clk_" prefix awful, but I'll just assume
it is too late.

Miquèl

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29 14:44 [PATCH v5 0/9] clk: nuvoton: ma35d1: Fix mux parenting and peripheral clock rates Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] clk: nuvoton: ma35d1: Keep the clock count in the driver Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] dt-bindings: clock: ma35d1: Document the missing crystal inputs Miquel Raynal
2026-09-30 11:55   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] dt-bindings: clock: ma35d1: Drop CLK_MAX_IDX define Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] dt-bindings: clock: ma35d1: Add missing WDT/WWDT parent clocks Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] clk: nuvoton: " Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] clk: nuvoton: ma35d1: Use clk_hw pointers as mux parents Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] clk: nuvoton: ma35d1: Avoid possible error pointer dereferencing Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] clk: nuvoton: ma35d1: get HXT/LXT from DT Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 20:36     ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-30  7:39       ` Jerome Brunet
2026-09-30  9:12         ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 14:44 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] arm64: dts: nuvoton: ma35d1: Add LXT crystal and correct HXT name Miquel Raynal
2026-09-29 15:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 20:48     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pkxv4wd8.fsf@bootlin.com \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.