From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-106111.protonmail.ch (mail-106111.protonmail.ch [79.135.106.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362522BE65F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 13:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.111 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784122470; cv=none; b=PoN+2k/RzDsHnrzTy0TG3jMH8ujMTLOSnAbc57dESoH/fAqOEZGd29OF73SendYco6qNX6BgG/5ppV9DnIsF4EEqRkL/AW5ccjfu1rm/rRf5USD+oVYqDOp7lSqf1487lfbC4qs0z2RZdFcv5wvYZUm77SkWS+ku42UnwT27Hxg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784122470; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EH95bEevB45vxfH2KqHvjnVJ226QdA1HvBdpeO/qbwo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=goQSJSacmw29brSzNRJPOzbfZF/1a4B9KhD8tyc0S1ldj+PBvRre3lTv25y3YJIsbYlJBBh6IufQsY9ukGLf23srwO0KkGQMM0mw27UHYBLKAQX7xstkhPyA/hqtp+JoE68WxCmcEp/xpNdD2veHwpafFi686cB2VGoSuqmGuUk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=geanix.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=geanix.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=geanix.com header.i=@geanix.com header.b=kr+XCncP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.111 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=geanix.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=geanix.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=geanix.com header.i=@geanix.com header.b="kr+XCncP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=geanix.com; s=protonmail3; t=1784122465; x=1784381665; bh=echToQREUj3vG9DGTBHTEImDNDMRsG75DxT+FmAyuVE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:From:To: Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=kr+XCncPbRXLzNteWA0HsFtZg+sLXFrZHVJ0eKi/guUuYzvp621RDZAgPjSz9Fdrx 4SEQ3gxt4CrBlzihTyfs4uZSAOjBKtYeoou/RyH6/gtnrE4bDHg4oUH8NzHwB95XD0 UY+ZQPY67n1HbS8pTjA0INAwVyhV+nECf9oj/uLpI6H7TiDQeJ5N06TZqiPwoJdE5A SF0lBtG/GFDhJ+eNyMZ3KZ2rtvaSV17Dp+cuNiiR/bynzyi6pJcMPniR6Ab4uUTe8x DrroX1CzyDtiypONcXMF1IIw9WbZU+WgiTn+YPt1VipxojbIDOdqTyAHhJHKe12Lcg Y6SHqKyIbiLJw== X-Pm-Submission-Id: 4h0cbK44JCz1DDp8 From: Esben Haabendal To: Nuno =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A1?= Cc: "Joshua Crofts" , "Jonathan Cameron" , "David Lechner" , Nuno =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A1?= , "Andy Shevchenko" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Nikita Travkin" , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] iio: light: ltr501: Add ltr329 support In-Reply-To: <4bn5dd27ie653f5324pluaoamua4bxdbmxm47rif4yumxxl5un@anbjqozl6ovj> ("Nuno =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A1=22's?= message of "Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:17:33 +0200") References: <20260715-liteon-ltr329-v2-0-d18af55edab5@geanix.com> <20260715145546.00005bc8@gmail.com> <4bn5dd27ie653f5324pluaoamua4bxdbmxm47rif4yumxxl5un@anbjqozl6ovj> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:34:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87pl0oml5v.fsf@geanix.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nuno S=C3=A1 writes: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 02:55:46PM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:27:22 +0200 >> Esben Haabendal wrote: >> >> > The LiteON LTR-329ALS-01 chip is similar to the LTR-303ALS-01, except = for >> > interrupt support and related registers, which LTR-329ALS-01 does not = have. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal >> > --- >> > Changes in v2: >> > - Fixed error handling when irq is defined for a chip that does not su= pport >> > irq, powering the chip down again. >> > - Added simlar fix to error handling of devm_request_threaded_irq() er= ror >> > handling, powering the chip down again on failure. >> > - Added explicit #include . >> > - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260715-liteon-ltr329-v1-0-31f= 027051594@geanix.com >> > >> >> Quick process thing, please wait at least 24 hours before sending >> a new version - let it sit on the mailing list so other reviewers >> can send feedback! Larger series should wait a couple of days. > > Yeah, as a nice rule of thumb at least a couple of days. Fair enough. /Esben