From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F34213F99E1 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782485065; cv=none; b=OfmVzqZ4cNXDL9LQIfCs6zhlVsbMNdxss9uFlWngFIfufhk98a7b1xKHyG0wfRBnT48zZMJ1p90AafATmPOJBzt1sWpw8BfISfDLzXGJU+vFdx+CcEZy9Heer3QsChGw/ziIYGitYVz7i3C2/jAr+JMpmDL+/Voa/8hMecbOiPU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782485065; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AXEWSuQQjGWCfwJTO0bhxOszKRIQ5sMSOWMELhmxSLU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lxQi4hssYFR9VbLJmIPrtgx4nphQAPFolEnEPiszRS1w+zFC93urMDfr7/6CUopFeYcbKJ9BUKVFq3FVBBDXzHXWYGjuSxbye+axtFXiw66OWB2/c4GGx/Jg3enJ/z3gHEIkPBuFM4wR0OPa2KbDMd3mDdYrISBsr8k/12vTpqs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AL5DMPAi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AL5DMPAi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA7031F000E9; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 14:44:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782485064; bh=AXEWSuQQjGWCfwJTO0bhxOszKRIQ5sMSOWMELhmxSLU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=AL5DMPAixIaHjdOauhvZ50M3EtCAYCPUDaeXc00jMDWUQPfo1R5nCTvXrDT+86Cjn +A9bs/VTAZhzuyM8X58luwos+GaPUMMYDFJ5wo8BrPSB7quZODRAXzKspDOY/1OOCu bNPzUeAxH13UDfGF+AdIpJzncAIxN7/1HM7OcnQXu3FVL/e6rVc03XR7vLvNzS8JHb EC0DxepfLyNWkhW2tlJyyjUkXO3wpKixTs6l6mMBJQnlJ0Or6a+hpX/c+78KOzt3B+ FEo0aHGFK8EKUOY/0l6FPhu5eVZQwcAWPqCxDe/aGQywZhtIx7h2I1F04w4R0B43lX Z+Wh9TB/JTQgg== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Chuyi Zhou , mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, nadav.amit@gmail.com, vkuznets@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chuyi Zhou Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/14] scftorture: Remove preempt_disable() in scftorture_invoke_one() In-Reply-To: <20260616111127.966468-10-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com> References: <20260616111127.966468-1-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com> <20260616111127.966468-10-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:44:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87pl1dicoq.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jun 16 2026 at 19:11, Chuyi Zhou wrote: > Previous patches make smp_call*() functions handle preemption logic Get rid of this previous patches wording. Once this is merged into git 'previous patches' becomes completely meaningleass.