From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83351D2F7EE for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72278042F; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 14:53:07 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BQJynffr"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id D32B2809A5; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 14:53:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204438004F for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 14:53:04 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mkorpershoek@kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA3A43AF5; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB778C4CEF1; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:53:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764942782; bh=tIQNQxgEwWrx/A3zja2NFK5UaPdQCTCajcGDrnuivvk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=BQJynffrMUPLNHPKjQYZMOx80GMLMHWnTmPxIc8NgCc0aErxG749um1QiyO/cf/OS +/5qa8uPUU3xKok3VgSOkQitrD9aLZ66Q9LpKZouOmzlSJFyof5OvbJMqZjk8NWfyW KoMLUfVDP0z4pWW+ICCJLGeHsrJmCMh6OGTmX455UQd0Ukwh4NReWx8bGxZqx5uGNJ PJbwU+7fPPIuqMzfEpRgwzNyZOn0y7LRlVwtbvRCSoetEfv6jgb+KSYjuVNs9iM/mr aHyiufhmXfY6WkO6SVYs+hkBrDG0rPLdJoAKAtcgpz7PnugjLciMpHpBJJqQYmH26m OfYvXsqUZRI7A== From: Mattijs Korpershoek To: Udit Kumar , trini@konsulko.com Cc: nm@ti.com, u-boot@lists.denx.de, mkorpershoek@kernel.org, n-francis@ti.com, anshuld@ti.com, Udit Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: board: ti: Add J742S2 support In-Reply-To: <20251205043602.845730-1-u-kumar1@ti.com> References: <20251205043602.845730-1-u-kumar1@ti.com> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 14:52:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87pl8trq6c.fsf@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Udit, Thank you for the patch. On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 10:06, Udit Kumar wrote: > J742S2 SOC is derivative of J784S4, most of build infra of j784s4 is used > to build u-boot for J742S2 EVM board. > > Add guide users on how to build for that board. > > Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar > --- > Test logs > https://gist.github.com/uditkumarti/b2e23151728628805a680b6eab528e7c > > Changelog: > Changes in v2: > - Removed extra = > - link to v1: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251204142451.834404-1-u-kumar1@ti.com/ > > doc/board/ti/j784s4_evm.rst | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/board/ti/j784s4_evm.rst b/doc/board/ti/j784s4_evm.rst > index 22442874110..69deeee1076 100644 > --- a/doc/board/ti/j784s4_evm.rst > +++ b/doc/board/ti/j784s4_evm.rst > @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ > .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause > .. sectionauthor:: Apurva Nandan > > -J784S4 and AM69 Platforms > -========================= > +J742S2, J784S4 and AM69 Platforms > +================================= > > Introduction > ------------ > @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ Platform information: > * https://www.ti.com/tool/J784S4XEVM > * https://www.ti.com/tool/SK-AM69 > > +J742S2 is derivative of J784S24 SOC, More info can be found in > + > +* TRM : https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruje3/spruje3.pdf > +* Platform Information : https://www.ti.com/tool/J742S2XH01EVM > + > Boot Flow > --------- > Below is the pictorial representation of boot flow: > @@ -99,6 +104,15 @@ Set the variables corresponding to this platform: > export UBOOT_CFG_CORTEXR=am69_sk_r5_defconfig > export UBOOT_CFG_CORTEXA=am69_sk_a72_defconfig > > +.. note:: > + > + For J742S2-EVM, use the following U_BOOT_CFG instead: > + > + .. prompt:: bash > + > + export UBOOT_CFG_CORTEXR=j742s2_evm_r5_defconfig > + export UBOOT_CFG_CORTEXA=j742s2_evm_a72_defconfig > + nitpick: Can't this be grouped in the same .. note:: block as for AM69 defconfigs ? I tend to dislike multiple notes blocks one after another. It is fine if you don't want to change this as it's a "personal preference". > .. j784s4_evm_rst_include_start_build_steps > > 1. Trusted Firmware-A > @@ -146,13 +160,19 @@ variant (GP, HS-FS, HS-SE) requires a different source for these files. > - HS-FS > > * tiboot3-j784s4-hs-fs-evm.bin from :ref:`step 3.1 ` > + * tiboot3-j742s2-hs-fs-evm.bin from :ref:`step 3.1 ` > * tispl.bin, u-boot.img from :ref:`step 3.2 ` > > - HS-SE > > * tiboot3-j784s4-hs-evm.bin from :ref:`step 3.1 ` > + * tiboot3-j742s2-hs-evm.bin from :ref:`step 3.1 ` > * tispl.bin, u-boot.img from :ref:`step 3.2 ` > > +.. note:: > + > + For J742S2, GP variant is not available. > + Can't this note be in the - GP section? Just after: """ * tispl.bin_unsigned, u-boot.img_unsigned from :ref:`step 3.2 ` """ In my opinion, it would make more sense than at the end of the Target Images section. > Image formats > ------------- > > -- > 2.34.1