From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD2D2580CF; Sun, 21 Sep 2025 22:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758495349; cv=none; b=Y9SB/jQ+E0m/cT17FH5MrpiLbhy1qs5ONPNaNU8AlMGBMU958F4DJeD6jUKSN9xqay0qSz3KyYBMGw9hHQ8rUp5Qz8cy88nMADYmSdtFhbEdUTyPRXufRkX4XL/aC/iV/DsNXcBV6y14GMlDc7bb90ZdeF5ZmKvDFOeYjIJ7uV0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758495349; c=relaxed/simple; bh=URIwaATUK+NdLnPeTmJDkZQV8VmgwLiZzwQtjRLdXck=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=B3KWev9fWJhxjyxQyU8tcGWVR67i4Hpsa5+WOmJRQjNA8+KAZqd3hGMBksYX1ScJiA1P24jWlXTTbHhOWlBKVlnaypFD9ZSlAz5opDDRKn5NgpHQCKuSmvv5lWpHWmLdEXiSstRfk8Kc4KJlIMu117odFM52c6KB7LOTXJ0D9Q4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=E3Un81n/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="E3Un81n/" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 6D58F40B16 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1758495347; bh=5zyaBbyPh7EAwE+GJ+JBL35RaUvfL2VQKPWUoi7fTG8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=E3Un81n/xEDKYy2uBwz3En1h09LckqOYXnfMk8JVtPZ/Hz9csC9i2K3Pbf+N129FP 9eoTmK1/K0nINGt8LqE+I3nflW4PWN7YFMZPD9Jm+CXNKORSeWHWPaj0aUfQ3TaUr4 BhYYwiobQ8Duy7JUx2JPQV+HAaJ4Pl1AKDkWSem162f/QC/rfP6wnQXfZjmpaYMmjw 79k2Tyiia0OopG0ZHZMTV+0csxXDCE1k13k1L8MP90wmXLJ/YfUWCdy4ZOMbBRLkBg f71aLHo8Yt5rgP19vy2vQBToxezz62rnb/XS86qOuc+OUpCMgbo7+SgG4sGNIrRfjq KiU6hCu9WM7GA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::824]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D58F40B16; Sun, 21 Sep 2025 22:55:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] A couple of patches for sphinx-build-wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 16:55:46 -0600 Message-ID: <87plbj8lfx.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This small series is against docs/build-script branch. > > The first patch addresses the lack of a check after running > sphinx-build to see if it returned some error code. > > The second patch is a partial revert: we wneded including > sphinx-build-wrapper twice due to a badly-solved rebase from > my side. > > The third patch is a bonus cleanup: it get rids with > load_config.py, replacing it by a single line at conf.py, > simplifying even further docs Makefile and docs build system. > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab (3): > tools/docs: sphinx-build-wrapper: handle sphinx-build errors > scripts: remove sphinx-build-wrapper from scripts/ > docs: conf.py: get rid of load_config.py OK, I've put these onto the build-script branch. Thanks, jon