All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>,
	pmladek@suse.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Add atomic context check inside console_unlock()
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:59:31 +0106	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plwo5z4k.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222090538.23017-1-quic_mojha@quicinc.com>

On 2024-02-22, Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com> wrote:
> Situation of schedule while atomic context can happen in a
> scenario if CPU-Y executing a async probe of ufs and while
> printing a line it is started spinning for console lock
> after preemption disable on CPU-Y and later it got the handover
> of console lock from CPU-X and in console_unlock() it get
> schedule with preempt disable as console_may_schedule was one
> and due to which do_cond_resched was one.

Nice catch. But I think the below patch is the appropriate fix:

John Ogness

-------8<--------
Subject: [PATCH] printk: Update @console_may_schedule in
 console_trylock_spinning()

console_trylock_spinning() may takeover the console lock from a
scheduable context. Update @console_may_schedule to make sure it
reflects a trylock acquire.

Reported-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240222090538.23017-1-quic_mojha@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/printk/printk.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 1685a71f3f71..1612b50b2374 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -2020,6 +2020,12 @@ static int console_trylock_spinning(void)
 	 */
 	mutex_acquire(&console_lock_dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_);
 
+	/*
+	 * Update @console_may_schedule for trylock because the previous
+	 * owner may have been scheduable.
+	 */
+	console_may_schedule = 0;
+
 	return 1;
 }
 

base-commit: e7081d5a9d976b84f61f497316d7c940a4a2e67a
-- 
2.30.2

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-22  9:05 [PATCH] printk: Add atomic context check inside console_unlock() Mukesh Ojha
2024-02-22 14:53 ` John Ogness [this message]
2024-02-26 10:17   ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-02-26 12:01     ` [PATCH] printk: Update @console_may_schedule in console_trylock_spinning() John Ogness
2024-02-26 12:17       ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-02-26 13:02         ` John Ogness
2024-02-27 16:37           ` Mukesh Ojha
2024-03-15 16:10       ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87plwo5z4k.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.