From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@kernel.org>
To: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org
Cc: weiyongjun1@huawei.com, shaozhengchao@huawei.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4,bpf-next] samples/bpf: check detach prog exist or not in xdp_fwd
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 11:25:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmjs7n1z.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220531121804.194901-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com> writes:
> Before detach the prog, we should check detach prog exist or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
The logic looks good now, just spotted one issue with the use of 'return
errno' (which I just realised I suggested on the last version, sorry
about that).
> samples/bpf/xdp_fwd_user.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_fwd_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_fwd_user.c
> index 1828487bae9a..a4ba53891653 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/xdp_fwd_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_fwd_user.c
> @@ -47,17 +47,61 @@ static int do_attach(int idx, int prog_fd, int map_fd, const char *name)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int do_detach(int idx, const char *name)
> +static int do_detach(int ifindex, const char *ifname, const char *app_name)
> {
> - int err;
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_xdp_attach_opts, opts);
> + struct bpf_prog_info prog_info = {};
> + char prog_name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
> + __u32 info_len, curr_prog_id;
> + int prog_fd;
> + int err = 1;
> +
> + if (bpf_xdp_query_id(ifindex, xdp_flags, &curr_prog_id)) {
> + printf("ERROR: bpf_xdp_query_id failed (%s)\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + return -errno;
The printf above may override errno, so this could return 0; the actual
return value is not really used by the caller, so you could just always
'return -1' or 'return err'.
> + }
> +
> + if (!curr_prog_id) {
> + printf("ERROR: flags(0x%x) xdp prog is not attached to %s\n",
> + xdp_flags, ifname);
> + goto err_out;
Doesn't really need a label, just do a direct return here as well.
> + }
>
> - err = bpf_xdp_detach(idx, xdp_flags, NULL);
> - if (err < 0)
> - printf("ERROR: failed to detach program from %s\n", name);
> + info_len = sizeof(prog_info);
> + prog_fd = bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id(curr_prog_id);
> + if (prog_fd < 0) {
> + printf("ERROR: bpf_prog_get_fd_by_id failed (%s)\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + return -errno;
Same issue as above with errno being overwritten.
> + }
> +
> + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(prog_fd, &prog_info, &info_len);
> + if (err) {
> + printf("ERROR: bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd failed (%s)\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + goto close_out;
> + }
> + snprintf(prog_name, sizeof(prog_name), "%s_prog", app_name);
> + prog_name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN - 1] = '\0';
> +
> + if (strcmp(prog_info.name, prog_name)) {
> + printf("ERROR: %s isn't attached to %s\n", app_name, ifname);
> + err = 1;
> + } else {
You can save a level of indentation by adding a 'goto close_out' after
'err=1' instead of using an 'else' block.
> + opts.old_prog_fd = prog_fd;
> + err = bpf_xdp_detach(ifindex, xdp_flags, &opts);
> + if (err < 0)
> + printf("ERROR: failed to detach program from %s (%s)\n",
> + ifname, strerror(errno));
> + /* TODO: Remember to cleanup map, when adding use of shared map
> + * bpf_map_delete_elem((map_fd, &idx);
> + */
> + }
>
> - /* TODO: Remember to cleanup map, when adding use of shared map
> - * bpf_map_delete_elem((map_fd, &idx);
> - */
> +close_out:
> + close(prog_fd);
> +err_out:
don't need the err_out label, see above.
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-31 12:18 [PATCH v4,bpf-next] samples/bpf: check detach prog exist or not in xdp_fwd Zhengchao Shao
2022-06-01 9:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2022-06-01 10:33 ` 答复: " shaozhengchao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmjs7n1z.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaozhengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.