From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cobalt/events: add auto-clear feature
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:16:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmltf82m.fsf@xenomai.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53b70915-2040-d2aa-3077-698fa8be01af@siemens.com>
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> writes:
> On 06.04.22 17:56, Philippe Gerum via Xenomai wrote:
>> From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
>>
>> The current implementation does not atomically consume+clear the event
>> set to be received by the waiter(s), which makes it useless for
>> anything but a plain one-time latch due to the race window this opens
>> with a consume[A]->signal[B]->clear[A] sequence.
>>
>> To address this issue, let's provide the auto-clear feature with
>> __cobalt_event_wait().
>>
>> This change affects the ABI by adding the auto-clear mode as an opt-in
>> feature, enabled by passing COBALT_EVENT_AUTOCLEAR to
>> cobalt_event_init().
>>
>
> Makes sense, but shouldn't autoclear be rather the default then? Which
> users are affected? None in-tree so far?
>
There is one user in copperplate:
https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai/-/blob/28158391258eea52650856bef5d3ed6ebaaf813b/lib/copperplate/eventobj.c#L87
which indirectly affects rt_event_signal() from the alchemy API:
https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai/-/blob/28158391258eea52650856bef5d3ed6ebaaf813b/lib/alchemy/event.c#L453
Nobody raised the issue so far with alchemy, which is why I refrained
from turning the autoclear mode on by default so far. This is debatable,
since no documentation explains the limitation on usage caused by not
having the autoclear mode set.
--
Philippe.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-06 15:56 [PATCH 1/5] cobalt/events: add auto-clear feature Philippe Gerum
2022-04-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] cobalt/events: add single-waiter delivery mode Philippe Gerum
2022-04-07 9:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-04-07 11:26 ` Philippe Gerum
2022-04-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] copperplate, testsuite: convert to cobalt_event_broadcast() Philippe Gerum
2022-04-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] lib/cobalt: deprecate cobalt_event_post() Philippe Gerum
2022-04-06 15:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] drivers: ipc: enable non-blocking write from regular threads Philippe Gerum
2022-04-07 9:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-04-07 11:37 ` Philippe Gerum
2022-04-13 11:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-04-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] cobalt/events: add auto-clear feature Jan Kiszka
2022-04-07 11:16 ` Philippe Gerum [this message]
2022-04-07 16:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-04-07 17:09 ` Philippe Gerum
2022-04-13 11:20 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmltf82m.fsf@xenomai.org \
--to=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.