All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] irqchip: Add RZ/G2L IA55 Interrupt Controller driver
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:13:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmmky2tw.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220317012404.8069-3-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>

On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 01:24:01 +0000,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> 
> Add a driver for the Renesas RZ/G2L Interrupt Controller.
> 
> This supports external pins being used as interrupts. It supports
> one line for NMI, 8 external pins and 32 GPIO pins (out of 123)
> to be used as IRQ lines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig             |   8 +
>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile            |   1 +
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 462 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 471 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 7038957f4a77..afc5999f4955 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -242,6 +242,14 @@ config RENESAS_RZA1_IRQC
>  	  Enable support for the Renesas RZ/A1 Interrupt Controller, to use up
>  	  to 8 external interrupts with configurable sense select.
>  
> +config RENESAS_RZG2L_IRQC
> +	bool "Renesas RZ/G2L (and alike SoC) IRQC support" if COMPILE_TEST
> +	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> +	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> +	help
> +	  Enable support for the Renesas RZ/G2L (and alike SoC) Interrupt Controller
> +	  for external devices.
> +
>  config SL28CPLD_INTC
>  	bool "Kontron sl28cpld IRQ controller"
>  	depends on MFD_SL28CPLD=y || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index c1f611cbfbf8..b536e514a7c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RDA_INTC)			+= irq-rda-intc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_INTC_IRQPIN)	+= irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_IRQC)		+= irq-renesas-irqc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_RZA1_IRQC)		+= irq-renesas-rza1.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_RZG2L_IRQC)	+= irq-renesas-rzg2l.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VERSATILE_FPGA_IRQ)	+= irq-versatile-fpga.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NSPIRE)		+= irq-zevio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VT8500)		+= irq-vt8500.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..be9741e88bd7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Renesas RZ/G2L IRQC Driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Renesas Electronics Corporation.
> + *
> + * Author: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +
> +#define IRQC_IRQ_START			1
> +#define IRQC_IRQ_COUNT			8
> +#define IRQC_TINT_START			9
> +#define IRQC_TINT_COUNT			32
> +#define IRQC_NUM_IRQ			41
> +
> +#define ISCR				0x10
> +#define IITSR				0x14
> +#define TSCR				0x20
> +#define TITSR0				0x24
> +#define TITSR1				0x28
> +#define TITSR0_MAX_INT			16
> +#define TITSEL_WIDTH			0x2
> +#define TSSR(n)				(0x30 + ((n) * 4))
> +#define TIEN				BIT(7)
> +#define TSSEL_SHIFT(n)			(8 * (n))
> +#define TSSEL_MASK			GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define IRQ_MASK			0x3
> +
> +#define TSSR_OFFSET(n)			((n) % 4)
> +#define TSSR_INDEX(n)			((n) / 4)
> +
> +#define TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_RISING	0
> +#define TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_FALLING	1
> +#define TITSR_TITSEL_LEVEL_HIGH		2
> +#define TITSR_TITSEL_LEVEL_LOW		3
> +
> +#define IITSR_IITSEL(n, sense)		((sense) << ((n) * 2))
> +#define IITSR_IITSEL_LEVEL_LOW		0
> +#define IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_FALLING	1
> +#define IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_RISING	2
> +#define IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_BOTH		3
> +#define IITSR_IITSEL_MASK(n)		IITSR_IITSEL((n), 3)
> +
> +#define TINT_EXTRACT_HWIRQ(x)		((x) & ~GENMASK(31, 16))
> +#define TINT_EXTRACT_GPIOINT(x)		((x) >> 16)
> +
> +struct rzg2l_irqc_priv {
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	struct of_phandle_args map[IRQC_NUM_IRQ];
> +	raw_spinlock_t lock;
> +};
> +
> +struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data {
> +	int tint;
> +};
> +
> +static struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *irq_data_to_priv(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +	return data->domain->host_data;
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> +	unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d) - IRQC_IRQ_START;
> +	u16 bit = BIT(hw_irq);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);

Why the irqsave flavour? Is there any case where EOI isn't performed
in a context that has interrupts already disabled?

> +	reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + ISCR);
> +	if (reg & bit)
> +		writel_relaxed(GENMASK(IRQC_IRQ_COUNT - 1, 0) & ~bit,
> +			       priv->base + ISCR);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +	irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_tint_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> +	unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +	u32 bit = BIT(hw_irq - IRQC_TINT_START);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +	reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSCR);
> +	if (reg & bit)
> +		writel_relaxed(GENMASK(IRQC_TINT_COUNT - 1, 0) & ~bit,
> +			       priv->base + TSCR);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +	irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irqc_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> +	if (hw_irq >= IRQC_IRQ_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)
> +		return rzg2l_irq_eoi(d);

return function_returning_void()? No, please.

> +	else if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_TINT_COUNT)
> +		return rzg2l_tint_eoi(d);

Move the locking and the call to irq_chip_eoi_parent() here, as there
is no need to duplicate any of this.

> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> +	if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_TINT_COUNT) {
> +		struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> +		u32 offset = hw_irq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> +		u32 tssr_offset = TSSR_OFFSET(offset);
> +		u8 tssr_index = TSSR_INDEX(offset);
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +		u32 reg;
> +
> +		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +		reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> +		reg &= ~(TSSEL_MASK << tssr_offset);
> +		writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +	}
> +	irq_chip_disable_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> +	if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_TINT_COUNT) {
> +		struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> +		struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = d->chip_data;
> +		u32 offset = hw_irq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> +		u32 tssr_offset = TSSR_OFFSET(offset);
> +		u8 tssr_index = TSSR_INDEX(offset);
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +		u32 reg;
> +
> +		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +		reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> +		reg |= (TIEN | chip_data->tint) << TSSEL_SHIFT(tssr_offset);
> +		writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +	}
> +	irq_chip_enable_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static int rzg2l_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +	unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d) - IRQC_IRQ_START;
> +	struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u16 sense, tmp;
> +
> +	switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> +		sense = IITSR_IITSEL_LEVEL_LOW;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> +		sense = IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_FALLING;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> +		sense = IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_RISING;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
> +		sense = IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_BOTH;
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);

This already happens in an irq disabled context.

> +	tmp = readl_relaxed(priv->base + IITSR);
> +	tmp &= ~IITSR_IITSEL_MASK(hw_irq);
> +	tmp |= IITSR_IITSEL(hw_irq, sense);
> +	writel_relaxed(tmp, priv->base + IITSR);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);

What about the parent irqchip? If this is a hierarchical setup, it
definitely should be told.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rzg2l_tint_set_edge(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +	struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> +	unsigned int hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +	u32 titseln = hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 offset;
> +	u8 sense;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> +		sense = TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_RISING;
> +		break;
> +
> +	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> +		sense = TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_FALLING;
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (titseln < TITSR0_MAX_INT) {
> +		offset = TITSR0;
> +	} else {
> +		titseln /= TITSEL_WIDTH;
> +		offset  = TITSR1;
> +	}
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> +	reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + offset);
> +	reg &= ~(IRQ_MASK << (titseln * TITSEL_WIDTH));
> +	reg |= sense << (titseln * TITSEL_WIDTH);
> +	writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + offset);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rzg2l_irqc_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> +	unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> +
> +	if (hw_irq >= IRQC_IRQ_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)
> +		return rzg2l_irq_set_type(d, type);
> +	else if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_TINT_COUNT)
> +		return rzg2l_tint_set_edge(d, type);
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip irqc_chip = {
> +	.name			= "rzg2l-irqc",
> +	.irq_eoi		= rzg2l_irqc_eoi,
> +	.irq_mask		= irq_chip_mask_parent,
> +	.irq_unmask		= irq_chip_unmask_parent,
> +	.irq_disable		= rzg2l_irqc_irq_disable,
> +	.irq_enable		= rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable,

So this looks a bit odd. irq_mask only calls the parent and does nothing
locally, while irq_disable does something locally and calls into the
parent. If the parent is a GIC, this is turned into a mask (GIC has no
notion of disabled).

If that's the flow you expect, good. But please check this is the case.

> +	.irq_get_irqchip_state	= irq_chip_get_parent_state,
> +	.irq_set_irqchip_state	= irq_chip_set_parent_state,
> +	.irq_retrigger		= irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
> +	.irq_set_type		= rzg2l_irqc_set_type,
> +	.flags			= IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND |
> +				  IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED |
> +				  IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> +};
> +
> +static int rzg2l_irqc_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> +			    unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = domain->host_data;
> +	struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = NULL;
> +	struct irq_fwspec spec;
> +	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> +	int tint = -EINVAL;
> +	unsigned int type;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = irq_domain_translate_twocell(domain, arg, &hwirq, &type);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * For TINIT interrupts ie where pinctrl driver is child of irqc domain
> +	 * the hwirq and TINT are encoded in fwspec->param[0].
> +	 * hwirq for TINIT range from 9-40, hwirq is embedded 0-15 bits and TINT
> +	 * from 16-31 bits. TINIT from the pinctrl driver needs to be programmed
> +	 * in IRQC registers to enable a given gpio pin as interrupt.
> +	 */
> +	if (hwirq > IRQC_IRQ_COUNT) {
> +		tint = TINT_EXTRACT_GPIOINT(hwirq);
> +		hwirq = TINT_EXTRACT_HWIRQ(hwirq);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (hwirq > (IRQC_NUM_IRQ - 1))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (tint != -EINVAL && (hwirq < IRQC_TINT_START || hwirq > (IRQC_NUM_IRQ - 1)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	chip_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!chip_data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	chip_data->tint = tint;
> +
> +	ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq, &irqc_chip,
> +					    chip_data);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(chip_data);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	spec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> +	spec.param_count = priv->map[hwirq].args_count;
> +	for (i = 0; i < spec.param_count; i++)
> +		spec.param[i] = priv->map[hwirq].args[i];
> +
> +	ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs, &spec);
> +	if (ret)
> +		kfree(chip_data);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irqc_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> +				   unsigned int nr_irqs)
> +{
> +	struct irq_data *d;
> +
> +	d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> +	if (d) {
> +		struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = d->chip_data;
> +
> +		kfree(chip_data);
> +	}
> +	irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops rzg2l_irqc_domain_ops = {
> +	.alloc = rzg2l_irqc_alloc,
> +	.free = rzg2l_irqc_domain_free,
> +	.translate = irq_domain_translate_twocell,
> +};
> +
> +static int rzg2l_irqc_parse_map(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
> +				struct device_node *np,
> +				struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> +	unsigned int len, j;
> +	const __be32 *range;
> +
> +	range = of_get_property(np, "interrupts", &len);
> +	if (!range)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (len /= sizeof(*range), j = 0; len >= 3; len -= 3) {
> +		if (j >= IRQC_NUM_IRQ)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		priv->map[j].args[0] = be32_to_cpu(*range++);
> +		priv->map[j].args[1] = be32_to_cpu(*range++);
> +		priv->map[j].args[2] = be32_to_cpu(*range++);
> +		priv->map[j].args_count = 3;
> +		j++;
> +	}

I'm confused. Why do you have to invent a new interrupt parser? What
is wrong with of_irq_parse_one() populating the of_phandle_args array?
I expected to see something like:

static void rzg2l_irqc_parse_map(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
				 struct device_node *np)
{
	int i;

	for (i = 0; i < IRQC_NUM_IRQ; i++)
		of_irq_parse_one(np, i, &priv->map[i]);
}

and that's it.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-17  1:23 [RFC PATCH v4 0/5] Renesas RZ/G2L IRQC support Lad Prabhakar
2022-03-17  1:24 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Renesas RZ/G2L Interrupt Controller Lad Prabhakar
2022-03-17  9:44   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-17 11:55     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-03-17 13:34       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-17  1:24 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] irqchip: Add RZ/G2L IA55 Interrupt Controller driver Lad Prabhakar
2022-03-17 16:13   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-03-18 14:59     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-03-18 17:44       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-03-17  1:24 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/5] gpio: gpiolib: Allow free() callback to be overridden Lad Prabhakar
2022-03-18 15:15   ` Lad, Prabhakar
2022-03-17  1:24 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/5] gpio: gpiolib: Add ngirq member to struct gpio_irq_chip Lad Prabhakar
2022-03-17  1:24 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/5] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add IRQ domain to handle GPIO interrupt Lad Prabhakar
2022-03-17  8:46 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/5] Renesas RZ/G2L IRQC support Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-17  9:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-03-17 11:59     ` Lad, Prabhakar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pmmky2tw.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.