From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EC2C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120692088E for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="YHIjFvx6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728252AbgE1JgH (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 05:36:07 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:21852 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727981AbgE1JgG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 05:36:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590658566; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=m0aYzz3nH2uEbTQ3n4uYzX3uk+4ra+gAmmReAU7Irco=; b=YHIjFvx6SNCnKybf7Wv4aiu8BY90nnLzILL86kudZfvbConrU4AThAXD6Eoi5qdNXh+8q2 gWAWW8NLm0VNO8QV1GKbTjfselRHwjcBA24zNuDqefWIHOJTsHdg6qiw1Niq1CAyUB+hGN XOnVCU9fIPkDqSe06gF3rfpXeGBDUog= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-109--lB-pq1wM3uppJsBRLqrhQ-1; Thu, 28 May 2020 05:36:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -lB-pq1wM3uppJsBRLqrhQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F78C107BEF6; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-91.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.91]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90A19CB9; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:35:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" , linux-man Subject: Re: [PATCH] ld.so.8: Update "Hardware capabilities" section for glibc 2.31. References: <57abae5e-2394-0542-9e21-10c0bb837078@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 11:35:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <57abae5e-2394-0542-9e21-10c0bb837078@redhat.com> (Carlos O'Donell's message of "Wed, 27 May 2020 16:02:27 -0400") Message-ID: <87pnaoe70h.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org * Carlos O'Donell: > +The following names are currently recognized as of the release of glibc 2.31: > +.\" This information comes from glibc's sysdeps/*/dl-procinfo.c and is > +.\" currently not directly documented in the glibc manual. We document > +.\" it here with the help of the glibc maintainers. I'm not sure if this list is correct. Did you filter the hwcap strings based on HWCAP_IMPORTANT? Thanks, Florian